1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Cascaded integrated waveguide linear microcavity filters
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4813073
/content/aip/journal/apl/103/1/10.1063/1.4813073
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/103/1/10.1063/1.4813073
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Fabricated cascaded cavity filter: (a) top view of complete device showing integrated waveguide, silicon/air DBR mirrors, and micro-heaters ( = 1.5/2.5/1.5 configuration), (b) cleaved DBR test structure showing etched trenches ( = 2.5), (c) cleaved rib waveguide facet showing silicon device layer and 2 m thick buried SiO layer.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a)–(c) tuning, (d)–(f) tuning. Both cavities are matched in resonance for 3 V applied at cavity 2, as shown in case (e). For cases (c) and (f), the two cavities have been tuned far out of resonance with each other resulting in a sharply reduced transmittance. The heater resistance is  = 109 Ω () and  = 103 Ω (). All measurements: TM-polarization.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) Comparison of measured and transfer matrix calculation for a single- ( = 1.5/1.5) and a cascaded-cavity filter ( = 1.5/2.5/1.5); (b) extinction for the cascaded cavity filter. In contrast to ring resonators, the Si/air DBRs have a large reflectivity bandwidth enabling the filters to achieve a large extinction over > 100 nm wavelength range. Both measurements: TM-polarization.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Cascaded filter with  = 2.5/4.5/2.5: (a) Measured spectrum with and without tuning; due to the narrow linewidth even a small cavity mismatch results in a low filter transmittance; inset: extinction in dB, (b) minimum linewidth in GHz for the resonance near 1613 nm; the FSR ≈ 1000 GHz. Note that the two curves in (a) are offset by 0.04 in the y-axis. All measurements: TE polarization.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Effect of higher-order waveguide modes on the filter transmission spectrum: (a) Excitation of the fundamental waveguide mode by aligning the input fiber at the waveguide center ( ), (b) excitation of both the fundamental and higher-order waveguide mode by offsetting the input fiber vertically ( ). The measured spectra clearly show that the spurious resonances are the result of a higher-order waveguide mode. Both measurements are for no cavity tuning, so the filter transmittance is not optimized in (a). All measurements: TM-polarization.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Effect of center mirror reflectivity and mode splitting due to inter-cavity coupling, (top) and (bottom): (a)  = 1.5/1.5/1.5, (b)  = 1.5/2.5/1.5, and (c)  = 1.5/3.5/1.5. All measurements: TE-polarization with optimal thermo-optic tuning.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/apl/103/1/10.1063/1.4813073
2013-07-03
2014-04-21
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Cascaded integrated waveguide linear microcavity filters
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/103/1/10.1063/1.4813073
10.1063/1.4813073
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM