Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
1. W. Ehrenberg and R. E. Siday, “ The refractive index in electron optics and the principles of dynamics,” Proc. Phys. Soc., Sec. B 62, 821 (1949).
2. Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, “ Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory,” Phys. Rev. 115, 485491 (1959).
3. B. Hiley, “ The early history of the Aharonov-Bohm effect,” preprint arXiv:1304.4736 (2013).
4. S. Olariu and I. I. Popescu, “ The quantum effects of electromagnetic fluxes,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 339436 (1985).
5. A. Tonomura, N. Osakabe, T. Matsuda, T. Kawasaki, J. Endo, S. Yano, and H. Yamada, “ Evidence for Aharonov-Bohm effect with magnetic field completely shielded from electron wave,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 792 (1986).
6. R. G. Chambers, “ Shift of an electron interference pattern by enclosed magnetic flux,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 35 (1960).
7. H. Batelaan and A. Tonomura, “ The Aharonov-Bohm effects: Variations on a subtle theme,” Phys. Today 62(9), 3843 (2009).
8. P. A. Sturrock, T. R. Groves, A. Ershkovich, C. A. Mead, H. Batelaan, and A. Tonomura, “ More variations on Aharonov-Bohm,” Phys. Today 63(4), 89 (2010).
9. M. Berry and M. Peshkin, “ Aptly named Aharonov-Bohm effect has classical analogue, long history,” Phys. Today 63(8), 89 (2010).
10. S. Frabboni, G. C. Gazzadi, and G. Pozzi, “ Nanofabrication and the realization of Feynman's two-slit experiment,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 073108 (2008).
11. S. Frabboni, G. C. Gazzadi, and G. Pozzi, “ Ion and electron beam nanofabrication of the which-way double-slit experiment in a transmission electron microscope,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 263101 (2010).
12. G. C. Gazzadi, H. Mulders, P. Trompenaars, A. Ghirri, M. Affronte, V. Grillo, and S. Frabboni, “ Focused electron beam deposition of nanowires from cobalt tricarbonyl nitrosyl (Co(Co)3NO) precursor,” J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 1960619611 (2011).
13.See supplementary material at for additional experimental data, theoretical analysis and measurements.[Supplementary Material]
14. L. Serrano-Ramón, R. Córdoba, L. A. Rodríguez, C. Magén, E. Snoeck, C. Gatel, I. Serrano, M. R. Ibarra, and J. M. De Teresa, “ Ultrasmall functional ferromagnetic nanostructures grown by focused electron-beam-induced deposition,” ACS Nano 5, 77817787 (2011).

Data & Media loading...


Article metrics loading...



In 1949, at the end of a paper dedicated to the concept of the refractive index in electron optics, Ehrenberg and Siday noted that wave-optical effects will arise from an isolated magnetic field even when the rays themselves travel in magnetic-field-free space. They proposed a two-slit experiment, in which a magnetic flux is enclosed between interfering electron beams. Now, through access to modern nanotechnology tools, we used a focused ion beam to open two nanosized slits in a gold-coated silicon nitride membrane and focused electron beam induced deposition to fabricate a thin magnetic bar between the two slits. We then performed Fraunhofer experiments in a transmission electron microscope equipped with a field emission gun and a Lorentz lens. By tilting the specimen in the objective lens field of the electron microscope, the magnetization of the bar could be reversed and the corresponding change in the phase of the electron wave observed directly in the form of a shift in the interference fringe pattern.


Full text loading...


Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd