Electron Kinetic Processes in CO Lasers
1.W. L. Nighan, Phys. Rev. A 2, 1989 (1970).
2.W. L. Nighan and J. H. Bennett, Appl. Phys. Letters 14, 240 (1969).
3.W. L. Nighan, Appl. Phys. Letters 15, 355 (1969).
4.M. C. Fowler, Appl. Phys. Letters 18, 175 (1971).
5.R. H. Bullis, W. L. Nighan, M. C. Fowler, and W. J. Wiegand, AIAA J. (to be published).
6.J. W. Rich, J. Appl. Phys. 42, 2719 (1971).
7.L. S. Frost and A. V. Phelps, Phys. Rev. 136, A1538 (1964).
8.D. Rapp and P. Englander‐Golden, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 1464 (1965).
9.H. S. W. Massey, E. H. S. Burhop, and H. B. Gilbody, Electronic and Ionic Impact Phenomena, Vol. 1 of Collisions of Electrons with Atoms (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1969), Chap. 4, p. 260.
10.E/N is defined as the ratio of the electric field intensity to the total neutral particle number density.
11.Maxwellian energy distributions would appear as straight lines in the semilogarithmic plot of Fig. 1.
12.In the present calculation, Phelps’s “continuous approximation to rotational excitation” was used. For CO, see R. D. Hake, Jr. and A. V. Phelps [Phys. Rev. 158, 70 (1967)];
12.for see L. S. Frost and A. V. Phelps [Phys. Rev. 127, 1621 (1962)].
13.M. L. Bhaumik, W. B. Lacina, and M. M. Mann, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE‐6, 575 (1970).
14.J. C. Y. Chen, J. Chem. Phys. 40, 3513 (1964).
15.For with the change in f(u) as Vibrational temperature was raised to 5000°K was found to be somewhat less than the difference between the curves labeled “c” and “d” in Fig. 1.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month