No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Quenching of laser dye fluorescence by absorption from an excited singlet state
1.J. A. Myer, C. L. Johnson, E. Kierstead, R. D. Sharma, and I. Itzkan, Appl. Phys. Letters 16, 3 (1970).
2.G. Neumann and I. Wieder, Opt. Commun. 5, 197 (1972).
3.M. Hercher, Appl. Opt. 6, 947 (1967).
4.F. Gires, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE‐2, 624 (1966).
5.C. R. Giuliano and L. D. Hess, J. Quantum Electron. QE‐3, 358 (1967).
6.W. E. K. Gibbs, Appl. Phys. Letters 11, 113 (1967).
7.J. Porter and M. R. Topp, Nature 220, 1228 (1968).
8.J. R. Novak and M. W. Windsor, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A 308, 95 (1968).
9.A. Muller and E. Pfluger, Chem. Phys. Letters 2, 155 (1968).
10.R. Bonneau, J. Faure, and J. Joussot‐Dubien, Chem. Phys. Letters 2, 65 (1968).
11.R. Cooper and J. K. Thomas, J. Chem. Phys. 48, 5097 (1968).
12.Bitcom, Ltd., Kiryat Weizmann, P.O. Box 1299, Rehovot, Israel.
13.Geometrical effects were minimized by placing the detector at a distance much greater than dye cell dimensions. The possibility that stimulated emission might change the relative fraction of fluorescence seen by the detector at high excitation was checked by a series of experiments with diffusers. It was found that for the shape and dye concentration of the pumped volume in the present experiment the effect of stimulated emission on the fraction of fluorescence collected at the detector is negligible.
14.C. R. Goldschmidt, Y. Tomkiewicz, and I. B. Berlman, Chem. Phys. Letters 2, 520 (1968).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month