No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Penetration of a magnetic constriction by intense relativistic electron beams
1.J. Benford and B. Ecker, Phys. Rev. Letters 26, 1160 (1971);
1.J. Benford and B. Ecker, 28, 10 (1972)., Phys. Rev. Lett.
2.B. Ecker, J. Benford, C. Stallings, P. Spence, and S. Putnam in 11th Symposium on Electron, Ion, and Laser Beam Technology, edited by R. M. Thornley (San Francisco P., San Francisco, 1972).
3.L. P. Bradley, T. H. Martin, K. B. Prestwich, J. E. Boors, and D. L. Johnson (in Ref. 2) discuss a similar compression method using tapered conducting cylinders containing neutral gas.
4.H. Alfven, Phys. Rev. 55, 425 (1939). This model assumes uniform current density, which is the case at the apex of the pinch from 1.5 to
5.Note that if beam current were incompletely neutralized by plasma current this conclusion would be strengthened, since any net beam current would have increased the net magnetic field.
6.S. Putnam, Physics International Co. Final Report No. PIFR‐72–105, 1972 (unpublished);
6.Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 17, 100 (1972).
7.Noise precluded the pinch‐current measurement during the beam pulse. No pinch‐current change was detected after the beam pulse, but we could not have detected a change of less than 10%. The inductance change associated with local expansion of the field structure would produce a current change of
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month