Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Experimental flux shuttle
1.B. D. Josephson, Phys. Lett. 1, 251 (1962).
2.P. W. Anderson in Lectures on the Many‐Body Problem, Ravello, 1963, edited by E. Caianello (Academic, New York, 1964), Vol. 2, p. 115.
3.B. D. Josephson, Adv. Phys. 14, 419 (1965).
4.P. W. Anderson in Progress in Low‐Temperature Physics, edited by C. J. Gorter (North‐Holland, Amsterdam, 1967), Vol. 5, p. 1.
5.J. Matisoo, Proc. IEEE 55, 172 (1967).
6.P. W. Anderson, Phys. Today 23, 29 (1970).
7.P. W. Anderson, R. C. Dynes, and T. A. Fulton, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 16, 399 (1971).
8.T. A. Fulton, Proceedings of the Applied Superconductivity Conference (IEEE, New York, 1972).
9.T. A. Fulton, R. C. Dynes, and P. W. Anderson, Proc. IEEE (to be published).
10.C. S. Owen and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. 164, 538 (1967).
11.J. M. Rowell and W. L. Feldmann, Phys. Rev. 172, 393 (1968). Subharmonic structure is thought to be associated with metallic shorts through the tunneling barrier. Although a single short of this size could impede the operation of the shuttle, the critical current for a large applied magnetic field decreased steadily, indicating that the shorts were distributed.
Article metrics loading...