No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Double absorptions in aggregate‐roughened silver surfaces
1.R. W. Tokarsky and J. P. Marton, J. Appl. Phys. 45, 3047 (1974).
2.J. P. Marton and R. Lemon, Phys. Rev. B 4, 271 (1971).
3.See, for example, J. P. Marton, Appl. Phys. Lett. 18, 140 (1971);
3.O. Hunderi, Phys. Rev. B 7, 3419 (1972); and references therein.
4.K. L. Chopra, Thin Film Phenomena (McGraw‐Hill, New York, 1969).
5.R. W. Tokarsky and J. P. Marton, J. Appl. Phys. 45, 3051 (1974).
6.It is likely beyond 2 μm. Similar behavior, as discussed in I, was observed for the back surfaces of these films. As the shift is observed for all these films, and is not as extreme as those on the front surface, we can propose that for the smoothest film the corresponding front absorption is beyond 2 μm.
7.O. Hunderi and D. Beaglehole, Phys. Rev. B 2, 321 (1970).
8.J. C. Maxwell‐Garnett, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 203, 385 (1904).
9.With this model there is a one‐to‐one correspondence between each particle in the underlayer and each hillock on the surface. For this reason we expect the density factors for both to be approximately equal. This would break down for the smaller aggregates.
10.R. E. Hetrick and J. Lambe, Phys. Rev. B 11, 1273 (1975).
11.Considering the resonance for the smoothest film to be beyond 2 μm (Ref. 6), the shift becomes much greater than 1 μm.
12.P. Dobberstein, A. Hampe, and G. Sauerbrey, Phys. Lett. 27A, 256 (1968).
13.J. Endriz and W. E. Spicer, Phys. Rev. B 4, 4144 (1917).
14.See, for example, S. N. Jasperson and S. E. Schnatterly, Phys. Rev. 188, 759 (1969).
15.A. J. Braundmeier Jr. and E. T. Arakawa, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 35, 517 (1974).
16.W. H. Weber and S. L. McCarthy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 25, 396 (1975).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month