No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Transient versus steady‐state molecular absorption: Application to CO2 laser pulse‐duration discrimination
1.A preliminary description of these results was discussed by S. J. Czuchlewski, B. J. Feldman, R. A. Fisher, and A. V. Nowak lsqb;Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 21, 1283 (1976)].
2.T. Leonard, N. K. Moncur, and D. Sullivan, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 4021 (1976).
3.J. F. Figueira and H. D. Sutphin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 25, 11 (1974).
4.K. R. Manes, D. L. Smith, R. A. Haas, and S. S. Glaros, J. Quantum Electron. QE‐11, 635 (1975).
5.C. R. Phipps, Jr., S. J. Thomas, and J. F. Figueira, Digest, 1976 Conf. Laser and Electro‐optical Systems (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C., 1976), p. 30.
6.F. Rheault, J.‐L. Lachambre, P. Lavigne, H. Pépin, and H. A. Baldis, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 46, 1244 (1975).
7.The oscillator was kindly provided by S. J. Thomas.
8.E. J. McLellan and J. F. Figueira, in Ref. 5, p. 54.
9.This Los Alamos developed oscilloscope has a rise and fall time of 70 psec and a vertical sensitivity of 0.11 V/div. The French LEP‐manufactured cathode‐ray tube (Model TMC‐4) has virtually no writing‐rate sweep‐speed limitation because of the integrally manufactured channel plate intensifier.
10.When set up to avoid baseline feedthrough saturation, the short pulse may still saturate the hot because the saturation fluxes for the short pulse and the long pulse are significantly different due to rotational relaxation phenomena [see R. C. Crafer, A. F. Gibson, and M. F. Kimmit, J. Phys. D 2, 1135 (1969)]. Short‐pulse saturation could be beneficial because the short pulse is less attenuated by the absorber and because the secondary ringing diminishes.
11.M. Laue, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 18, 523 (1905);
11.A. Sommer‐feld, Phys. Z. 8, 841 (1907);
11.L. Brillouin, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 44, 203 (1914);
11.R. E. Holland, F. J. Lynch, G. J. Perlow, and S. S. Hanna, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 181 (1960);
11.F. J. Lynch, R. E. Holland, and M. Hamermesh, Phys. Rev. 120, 513 (1960);
11.N. S. Shiren, Phys. Rev. 128, 2103 (1962);
11.C. G. B. Garrett and D. E. McCumber, Phys. Rev. A 1, 305 (1970).
12.S. L. McCall, Ph.D. thesis (University of California, Berkeley, 1968) (unpublished);
12.C. K. Rhodes, A. Szöke, and A. Javan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1151 (1968);
12.D. C. Burnham and R. Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. 188, 667 (1969);
12.M. C. Crisp, Phys. Rev. A 1, 1604 (1970);
12.F. A. Hopf, C. K. Rhodes, G. L. Lamb, Jr., and M. O. Scully, Phys. Rev. A 3, 758 (1971);
12.J. M. Friedman, H. M. Gibbs, C. N. C. Venkatesan, B. Bölger, D. Polder, and M. F. H. Schuurmans, Opt. Commun. 20, 183 (1977).
13.A. Beer, Ann. Chem. Phys. 86, 78 (1852).
14.B. J. Feldman, R. A. Fisher, E. J. McLellan, and S. J. Thomas, Opt. Commun. 18, 72 (1976).
15.C. H. Townes and A. L. Schawlow, Microwave Spectroscopy (McGraw‐Hill, New York, 1955), p. 375.
16.H. P. Grieneisen, J. Goldhar, N. A. Kurnit, A. Javan, and H. R. Schlossberg, Appl. Phys. Lett. 21, 559 (1972);
16.S. M. Hamadani, J. Goldhar, N. A. Kurnit, and A. Javan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 25, 160 (1974);
16.E. Yablonovitch and J. Goldhar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 25, 580 (1974).
17.E. Fill, K. Hohla, G. T. Sehappert, and R. Volk, Appl. Phys. Lett. 29, 805 (1976).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month