No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Third‐order nonlinear susceptibility ratio by CARS of mixtures: CS2 in C6H6
1.R. W. Terhune and P. D. Maker, in Lasers, edited by A. K. Levine (Dekker, New York, 1968), Vol. 2, pp. 295–372;
1.P. D. Maker and R. W. Terhune, Phys. Rev. 137, A801 (1965).
2.M. D. Levenson and N. Bloembergen, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 1323 (1974).
3.M. D. Levenson and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 10, 4447 (1974).
4.H. Lotem and R. T. Lynch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 334 (1976).
5.R. T. Lynch and H. Lotem, J. Chem. Phys. 66, 1905 (1977).
6.S. Chandra, A. Compaan, and E. Wiener‐Avnear, Proc. Fourth Rochester Conference on Coherence and Quantum Optics (1977), edited by L. Mandel and E. Wolf (Plenum, New York, to be published);
6.S. Chandra, A. D. Compaan, and E. Wiener‐Avnear, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 22, 315 (1977).
7.A. Compaan, E. Wiener‐Avnear, and S. Chandra, Phys. Rev. A (to be published).
8.Our own measurements of spontaneous Raman scattering of the line show that Γ (half‐width at half‐maximum) varies from a value of in pure benzene to in dilute (1:10) mixtures of benzene in Our calculations show that whereas the line shape of the dispersion curve is a sensitive function of Γ, the frequency separation between extrema, Δ, is not.
9.J. E. Griffiths, M. Clerc, and P. M. Rentzepis, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 3824 (1974).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month