Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The quantum yield of silicon in the visible
1.R. Braunstein, Phys. Rev. 125, 475 (1962).
2.R. Loudon, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 80, 952 (1962).
3.R. J. Elliott, Phys. Rev. 108, 1384 (1957).
4.W. Spitzer and H. Y. Fan, Phys. Rev. 108, 268 (1957).
5.G. Harbeke, in Optical Properties of Solids (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1972), p. 84.
6.W. C. Dash and R. Newman, Phys. Rev. 99, 1151 (1955).
7.W. R. Runyan, NASA Report No. CR93154, 1968.
8.A. J. Tuzzolino, Phys. Rev. 134, A205 (1964).
9.L. Kock, J. Messier, and J. Valin, IRE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 8, 43 (1961).
10.O. Christensen, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 689 (1976).
11.E. Antoncîk, Czech. J. Phys. 7, 674 (1957).
12.W. Shockley, Czech. J. Phys. B11, 81 (1961).
13.H. J. Hovel, Semiconductors and Semimetals, Vol. 11, Solar Cells (Academic, New York, 1975), p. 13.
14.J. Lindmayer and J. F. Allison, COMSAT Tech. Rev. 3, 1 (1973).
15.C. T. Sah and C. T. Wang, J. Appl. Phys. 46, 1767 (1975).
16.D. Redfield, Appl. Phys. Lett. 33, 531 (1978).
17.J. Dziewior and W. Schmid, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 346 (1977).
18.Identification of a commercial device is provided for completeness of the experimental description. It implies neither NBS endorsement nor that the device is the best available for the particular application.
19.J. Lindmayer and J. F. Allison, COMSAT Tech. Rev. 3, 10 (1973).
20.H. R. Philipp, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 2835 (1972), and personal communication.
21.J. Geist, Appl. Opt. 18, 760 (1979).
22.J. Geist, L. B. Schmidt, and W. E. Case, Appl. Opt. 12, 2773 (1973).
23.Alternatively, K could be interpreted as the product of the quantum yield of silicon and the correction factor of the electrical substitution radiometer. However, the experimental results cover both a range of wavelengths for which K is required to be unity by conservation of energy, and a range of wavelengths where K could increase with decreasing wavelength. Since K is treated as a constant in this work, nothing can be learned from the alternate interpretation compared to that actually chosen.
24.We acknowledge the contribution of J. J. Filliben who provided an easily used fitting program.
25.One of the detectors has shown anomalous behavior throughout our investigations. Its bulk region lifetime is much less than that of the other detectors, and it yielded values of K around 0.98 unless the weighting of the data very accurately reflected the wavelength dependence of the measurement uncertainty. In this case its values of K fell within the range reported in the text.
26.K. Kaiser, EG & G (personal communication).
27.O. Christensen, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 693 (1976).
Article metrics loading...