No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Subpicosecond optoelectronic study of resistive and superconductive transmission lines
1.M. B. Ketchen, D. Grischkowsky, T. C. Chen, C.‐C. Chi, I. N. Duling, III, N. J. Halas, J.‐M. Halbout, J. A. Kash, and G. P. Li, Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 751 (1986).
2.P. Wolfe, B. J. Van Zeghbroeck, and U. Deutsch, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG‐21, 226 (1985).
3.D. R. Dykaar, T. Y. Hsiang, and G. A. Mourou, in Picosecond Electronics and Optoelectronics, edited by G. A. Mourou, D. M. Bloom, and C.‐H. Lee (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, and Tokyo, 1985), p. 249;
3.D. R. Dykaar, R. Sobolewski, T. Y. Hsiang, G. A. Mourou, M. A. Hollis, B. J. Clifton, K. B. Nichols, C. O. Bozler, and R. A. Murphy, Topical Meeting on Ultrafast Phenomena, June 1986, Snowmass, Colorado.
4.O. Heaviside, Electrician 19, 295 (1887),
4.reprinted in O. Heaviside, Electrical Papers (Chelsea, New York, 1970), Vol. 2, pp. 137–141;
4.E. Hallen, Electromagnetic Theory (Wiley, New York, 1962), pp. 409—414.
5.R. L. Kautz, J. Appl. Phys. 49, 308 (1978).
6.D. C. Mattis and J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. 111, 412 (1958).
7.The current concentration also lowers the inductance, cf. R. E. Matick, Transmission Lines for Digital and Communication Networks (McGraw‐Hill, New York, 1969), pp. 310–354. For our coplanar transmission line geometry, the inductance change is much less significant than the resistance change.
8.P. M. Solomon, Proc. IEEE 70, 489 (1982).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month