No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Off‐resonant third‐order optical nonlinearities of metal‐substituted phthalocyanines
1.J. R. Heflin, K. Y. Wong, O. Zamani‐Khamiri, and A. F. Garito, Phys. Rev. B 38, 1573 (1988).
2.A. M. Schaffer, M. Gouterman, and E. R. Davidson, Theor. Chim. Acta 30, 9 (5973).
3.A. W. Snow and N. L. Jarvis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 4706 (1984).
4.R. G. Caro and M. C. Gower, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE‐18, 1376 (1982).
5.A. Yariv, Optical Electronics, 3rd ed. (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1985).
6.D. M. Pepper, D. Fakeete, and A. Yariv, Appl. Phys. Lett. 33, 41 (1978).
7.Z. Z. Ho, C. Y. Ju, and W. M. Heatherington, J. Appl. Phys. 62, 716 (1987).
8.An earlier report of degenerate four‐wave mixing experiments on the metal‐free, Cu, and Ni tetrakis(cumylphenoxy)‐phthalocyanines did not show a strong metal dependence [P. N. Prasad, M. K. Casstevens, J. Pfleger, and P. Legation, Proc. SPIE 878, 106 (1988)]. However, these measurements were at 605 nm in the absorption hand. The observed was ascribed to saturable absorption of the Q band, a different mechanism from the susceptibility at 1.064 μm.
9.A. B. P. Lever, S. R. Pickens, P. C. Minor, S. Licoccia, B. S. Ramaswamy, and K. Magnell, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103, 6800 (1981).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month