No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
HYDROGEN MASER AND CESIUM BEAM TUBE FREQUENCY STANDARDS COMPARISON
1.H. E. Peters, J. Vanier, and R. F. C. Vessot, Proc. 7th International Conf. on Chronometry, Lausanne, Switzerland, June 1964, in press.
2.A. S. Bagley and L. S. Cutler, Hewlett‐Packard Journal 15, (11) (July 1964).
3.H. E. Peters and P. Kartaschoff, Appl. Phys. Letters, following Letter.
4.R. F. C. Vessot and H. E. Peters, Proc. 17th Annual Symp. on Freq. Control, U.S. Army Elect. R.&D. Lab., Fort Monmouth, N.J., May 1963.
5.W. Markowitz et al., Frequency, July–August 1963.
6.S. B. Crampton, Daniel Kleppner, and N. F. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. Letters 11, (7) (October 1963).
7.This standard uses the Varian BLR‐3 cesium beam tube.
8.R. F. C. Vessot and H. E. Peters, IRE Trans. Instrumentation I (11), 183 (1962).
9.J. Vanier and R. F. C. Vessot, Appl. Phys. Letters 4, (7), 122 (1 April 1964).
10.Wall material was FEP Teflon, value determined at Beverly for ‐in.‐diam. bulb.
11.J. Vanier, R. F. C. Vessot, and H. E. Peters, presented at the International Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements, Boulder, Colorado, June 1964, to be published in IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month