No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Influence of steps on quantum well states in Cu/Co(100) multilayers
1.S. S. P. Parkin, Z. G. Li, and D. J. Smith, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2710 (1991).
2.T. L. Hylton, K. R. Coffey, M. A. Parker, and J. K. Howard, Science 261, 1021 (1993).
3.P. M. Levy, S. Zhang, and A. Fert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1643 (1990);
3.A. Barthélémy and A. Fert, Phys. Rev. B 43, 13124 (1991);
3.R. Q. Hood and L. M. Falicov, Phys. Rev. B 46, 8287 (1992)., Phys. Rev. B
4.H. Itoh, J. Inoue, and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. B 47, 5809 (1993).
5.J. Unguris, R. J. Celotta, and D. T. Pierce, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 140 (1991).
6.E. Fullerton, D. M. Kelly, J. Guirapel, I. K. Schuller, and Y. Bruynseraede, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 859 (1992).
7.J. E. Mattson, C. H. Somers, A. Berger, and S. D. Bader, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3252 (1992).
8.G. R. Harp, S. S. P. Parkin, R. F. C. Farrow, R. F. Marks, M. F. Toney, Q. Y. Lam, T. A. Rabedeau, and R. J. Savoy, Phys. Rev. B 47, 8721 (1993).
9.M. J. Hall, B. J. Hickey, M. A. Howson, M. J. Walker, J. Xu, D. Greig, and N. Wiser, Phys. Rev. B 47, 12785 (1993).
10.S. S. P. Parkin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 1358 (1992).
11.W. P. Pratt, Jr., S.-F. Lee, Q. Yang, P. Holody, R. Loloee, P. A. Schroeder, and J. Bass, J. Appl. Phys. 73, 5326 (1993).
12.V. S. Speriosu, J. P. Nozieres, B. A. Gurney, B. Dieny, T. C. Huang, and H. Lefakis, Phys. Rev. B 47, 11 579 (1993).
13.J. E. Ortega and F. J. Himpsel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 844 (1992);
13.J. E. Ortega, F. J. Himpsel, G. J. Mankey, and R. F. Willis, Phys. Rev. B 47, 1540 (1993);
13.J. E. Ortega, F. J. Himpsel, G. J. Mankey, and R. F. Willis, J. Appl. Phys. 73, 5771 (1993).
14.K. Garrison, Y. Chang, and P. D. Johnson (unpublished);
14.C. Carbone, E. Vescovo, O. Rader, and W. Eberhardt (unpublished).
15.For details on the preparation and LEED analysis of stepped Cu(100) surfaces see J. E. Ortega, F. J. Himpsel, R. Haight, and D. R. Peale (unpublished).
16.Note that on the stepped surface the quantum well states are strongest with electrons incident along the  terrace normal, and not along the normal of the average surface. Strictly speaking, that should only be true in the absence of refraction of the electrons at the surface. With our experimental parameters this happens coincidently. Taking conservation properly into account, one finds at an incident energy of 11.5 eV above and at 10° off normal This nearly coincides with the of the bulk s,p band, if we take it near the Fermi level crossing along the  direction, i.e.,
17.For the dispersion of quantized s,p states in a Ag(100) slab see H. Erschbaumer, A. J. Freeman, C. L. Fu, and R. Podloucky, Surf. Sci. 243, 317 (1991). The Cu(100) s,p band is very similar to that of Ag(100) after rescaling the k scale (see Ref. 13).
18.A. Berger, U. Linke, and H. P. Oepen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 839 (1992);
18.H. P. Oepen, A. Berger, C. M. Schneider, T. Reul, and J. Kirschner, J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 121, 490 (1993).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month