No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Growth and microstructure of interfacially oriented large‐crystalline‐grain C60 sheets
1.W. Krätschmer, L. D. Lamb, K. Fostiropoulos, and D. R. Huffman, Nature 347, 354 (1990).
2.A. F. Hebard, M. J. Rosseinsky, R. C. Haddon, D. W. Murphy, S. H. Glarum, T. T. M. Palstra, A. P. Ramirez, and A. R. Kortan, Nature 350, 600 (1991).
3.T. T. M. Palstra, R. C. Haddon, A. F. Hebard, and J. Zaanen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1054 (1992).
4.G. Gensterblum, Y. Li-Ming, J. J. Pireaux, P. A. Thiry, R. Caudano, P. Lambin, A. A. Lucas, W. Kratschmer, and J. E. Fischer, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 53, 1427 (1992).
5.D. E. Luzzi, J. E. Fischer, X. Q. Wang, D. A. Ricketts-Foot, A. R. McGhie, and W. J. Romanow, J. Mater. Res. 7, 335 (1992).
6.J. E. Fischer, E. Werwa, and P. A. Heiney, Appl. Phys. A 56, 193 (1993).
7.R. L. Meng, D. Ramirez, X. Jiang, P. C. Chow, C. Diaz, K. Matsuishi, S. C. Moss, P. H. Hor, and C. W. Chu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 3402 (1991).
8.A. V. Hamza and M. Balooch, Chem. Phys. Lett. 198, 603 (1992);
8.J. Abrefah, D. R. Olanderm, M. Balooch, and M. Siekhaus, Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 1313 (1992).
9.S. W. Bailey, in Micas, edited by S. W. Bailey, Washington, DC (Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, 1984), Vol. 13, p. 1.
10.The surface structure of Muscovite 2M1 mica can be constructed (see Ref. 9) by forming a pseudohexagonal mesh, i.e., by repeating the following lengths; 2.80, 2.81, and 3.45 A° at 136.1°, 112.1°, and 111.9° with respect to each other. Muscovite 1M surface is nearly hexagonal and can be similarly constructed by repeating: 3.006, 3.004, and 3.006 A° lengths at 120.01°, 120.01°, and 119.98° with respect to each other.
11.D. Schmicker, S. Schmidt, J. G. Skofronick, J. P. Toennies, and R. Vollmer, Phys. Rev. B 44, 10995 (1991).
12.For thinner films than 1μm the diffracted intensities were too weak to determine the in-plane structures in transmission geometry.
13.A. Fartash (unpublished).
14.D. W. Pashley, Advan. Phys. 14, 327 (1965).
15.D. W. Pashley, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 37, 67 (1985).
16.S. Modesti, S. Cerasari, and P. Rudolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2469 (1993).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month