Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Calculated second‐harmonic susceptibilities of BN, AlN, and GaN
1.For a review, see S. Strite, M. E. Lin, and H. Morkoc, Thin Solid Films 231, 197 (1993).
2.A. F. Wright and J. S. Nelson, Phys. Rev. B 50, 2159 (1994).
3.M. P. Surh, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 43, 9126 (1991).
4.A. Rubio, J. L. Corkill, M. L. Cohen, E. L. Shirley, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B 48, 11 810 (1993).
5.N. E. Christensen and I. Gorczyca, Phys. Rev. B 50, 4397 (1994).
6.P. M. Lundquist, W. P. Lin, Z. Y. Xu, G. K. Wong, E. D. Rippert, J. A. Helfrich, and J. B. Ketterson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 1085 (1994).
7.W. P. Liu, P. M. Lundquist, G. K. Wong, E. D. Rippert, and J. B. Ketterson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2875 (1993).
8.M. Alouani and J. Willis (unpublished).
9.Z. H. Levine and D. C. Allan, Phys. Rev. B 44, 12 781 (1991); 48, 14 768 (E) (1993).
10.For an overall review of our methods, see Z. H. Levine, Int. J. Quantum Chem. (to be published).
11.Y. N. Xu and W. Y. Ching, Phys. Rev. B 48, 4335 (1993).
12.J. Miragliotta, D. K. Wickenden, T. J. Kistenmacher, and W. A. Bryden, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10, 1447 (1993) [GaN].
13.J. Miragliotta (private communication) [GaN].
14.Y. Fujii, S. Yoshida, S. Misawa, S. Maekawa, and S. Sakudo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 815 (1978) [AlN]. The authors speculated that the lattice distortion from perfect tetrahedron could strongly modify the susceptibilities of the bonds, thus causing a vanishing ratio of Our calculation was done for the experimental lattice geometry (Ref. 24); repeating it for the perfect tetrahedral geometry yields the ratio 0.10, which further supports our view that the bond additivity is inadequate for these materials.
15.B. F. Levine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 440 (1970).
16.D. D. Manchon, A. S. Barker, J. P. Dean, and R. B. Zetterstrom, Solid State Commun. 8, 1227 (1970).
17.Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edited by K.-H. Hellwege, Landolt–Bornstein Tables, Group III (Springer, New York, 1982), Vol. 17a.
18.A. T. Collins, E. C. Lightowlers, and P. J. Dean, Phys. Rev. 158, 833 (1967).
19.L. Akasaki and M. Hashimoto, Solid State Commun. 5, 851 (1967).
20.A. S. Barker and M. Ilegems, Phys. Rev. B 7, 743 (1973).
21.D. A. Roberts, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 28, 2057 (1992).
22.R. C. Miller, Appl. Phys. Lett. 5, 17 (1964).
23.F. N. H. Robinson, Phys. Lett. 26A, 435 (1968).
24.H. Schultz and K. H. Thiemann, Solid State Commun. 23, 815 (1977).
25.Z. H. Levine and D. C. Allan, Phys. Rev. B 48, 7783 (1993).
26.J. Chen, Z. H. Levine, and J. W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. B 50, 11 514 (1994).
27.The reported calculations were done using the norm-conserving pseudopotentials generated by the method of N. Troullier and J. L. Martins, Phys. Rev. B 43, 1993 (1991). We also tested some of the calculations using the hardness-conserving pseudopotentials by M. Teter, Phys. Rev. B 48, 5031 (1993). The differences between the results are small.
28.H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).
Article metrics loading...