Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Hole intersubband relaxation in CdTe/CdMnTe quantum wells
1.M. C. Tatham, J. F. Ryan, and C. T. Foxon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1637 (1989).
2.D. Y. Oberli, D. R. Wake, M. V. Klein, J. Klem, T. Henderson, and H. Morkoc̢, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 696 (1987).
3.J. Faist, C. Sirtori, F. Capasso, L. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 872 (1994).
4.R. A. Höpfel, R. Rodrigues, Y. Iimura, T. Yasui, Y. Segawa, Y. Aoyagi, and S. M. Goodnick, Phys. Rev. B 47, 10 943 (1993).
5.J. A. Levenson, G. Dolique, J. L. Oudar, and I. Abram, Phys. Rev. B 41, 3688 (1990).
6.Z. Xu, P. M. Fauchet, C. W. Rella, B. A. Richman, H. A. Schwettman, and G. W. Wicks, QELS Technical Digest Series (Optical Society of America, Washington, D. C., 1995), p. 267.
7.E. Vanelle, A. Alexandrou, J.-P. Likforman, D. Block, J. Cibert, and R. Romestain, Phys. Rev. B 53, R16 172 (1996).
8.Its final value is somewhat larger than in the previous case because the total number of photoinjected electron-hole pairs is larger.
9.X. R. Huang, D. R. Harken, A. N. Cartwright, A. L. Smirl, J. L. Sánchez-Rojas, A. Sacedón, E. Calleja, and E. Muñoz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 950 (1995).
10.E. Vanelle, Ph. D. thesis, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France, 1995.
11.P. J. Price, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 133, 217 (1981).
12.R. Ferreira and G. Bastard, Phys. Rev. B 40, 1074 (1989).
13.We have used a hole deformation potential =1.1 eV [H. Mathieu, J. Allegre, A. Chatt, P. Lefebvre, and J. P. Faurie, Phys. Rev. B 38, 7740 (1988)],
13.the =0 value of [ G. Fishman, Phys. Rev. B 52, 11132 (1995) and private communication], and the calculated envelope functions shown in the inset of Fig. 1. It should be noted that practically the same result is obtained for the envelope functions calculated in a square quantum well with the same splitting.
14.We have used a piezoelectric tensor component =0.7–1.4⋅ V/m [R. André, C. Bodin, J. Cibert, L. S. Dang, and G. Feuillet, J. Phys. (France) IV 3, 429 (1993)].
15.We have scaled the results of Ref. 12 using an impurity density of estimated from measurements of the value of the surface electric field at different distances from the surface (see Ref. 14).
16.S.-C. Lee, I. Galbraith, and C. R. Pidgeon, Phys. Rev. B 52, 1874 (1995).
17.J. H. Smet, C. G. Fonstad, and Q. Hu, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 9305 (1996).
Article metrics loading...