No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Activation volume for boron diffusion in silicon and implications for strained films
1.H. Park, K. S. Jones, J. A. Slinkman, and M. E. Law, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 3664 (1995).
2.M. J. Aziz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2810 (1997).
3.M. J. Aziz, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 469, 37 (1997).
4.H.-J. Gossmann, T. E. Haynes, P. A. Stolk, D. C. Jacobson, G. H. Gilmer, J. M. Poate, H. S. Luftman, T. K. Mogi, and M. O. Thompson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 3862 (1997).
5.A. Antonelli and J. Bernholc, Phys. Rev. B 40, 10643 (1989). This early calculation did not consider a wide variety of possible defect relaxations.
6.M. Tang, L. Colombo, J. Zhu, and T. Diaz de la Rubia, Phys. Rev. B 55, 14279 (1997).
7.O. Sugino and A. Oshiyama, Phys. Rev. B 42, 11869 (1990).
8.A. Antonelli, E. Kaxiras, and D. J. Chadi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2088 (1998).
9.H.-J. Gossmann, in Delta Doping of Semiconductors, edited by E. F. Schubert (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996), pp. 161 and 253.
10.Y. C. Zhao, W. Barvosa-Carter, S. D. Theiss, S. Mitha, M. J. Aziz, and D. Schiferl, J. Appl. Phys. 84, 4049 (1998).
11.The run-to-run temperature reproducibility is responsible for a ±7% uncertainty in D; the run-to-run SIMS depth profiling reproducibility is typically responsible for another ±7% uncertainty.
12.P. M. Fahey, P. B. Griffin, and J. D. Plummer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 289 (1989).
13.R. B. Fair, in Impurity Doping Process in Silicon, edited by F. F. Y. Wang (North–Holland, Amsterdam, 1981), p. 315.
14.H.-J. Gossmann, G. H. Gilmer, C. S. Rafferty, F. C. Unterwald, T. Boone, J. M. Poate, H. S. Luftman, and W. Frank, J. Appl. Phys. 77, 1948 (1995).
15.Via the −24.5 meV/GPa band gap narrowing; see S. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1981), p. 16.
16.This assumption could result in a small error that can be corrected when appropriate data become available.
17.W. T. C. Fang, T. T. Fang, P. B. Griffin, and J. D. Plummer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2085 (1996).
18.An alternative interpretation, that the time scale for self-interstitials to reach spikes 2–6 from the surface is much longer than 3 h, seems implausible in light of the measured value of quoted above.
19.J. Zhu, T. Diaz de la Rubia, L. H. Yang, C. Mailhiot, and G. H. Gilmer, Phys. Rev. B 54, 4741 (1996).
20.N. E. B. Cowern, W. J. Kersten, R. C. M. de Kruif, J. G. M. van Berkum, W. B. de Boer, D. J. Gravesteijn, and C. W. T. Bulle-Liewma, in Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Process Physics and Modeling in Semiconductor Devices; edited by G. R. Srinivasan, C. S. Murthy, and S. T. Dunham (Electrochemical Society, Pennington, NJ, 1996), Vol. 96-4.
21.P. Kuo, J. L. Hoyt, J. F. Gibbons, J. E. Turner, and D. Lefforge, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 580 (1995).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month