No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Raman scattering test of single-wall carbon nanotube composites
1.R. Saito, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, Physical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes (Imperial College Press, London, 1998).
2.M. F. Yu, B. S. Files, S. Arepalli, and R. S. Ruoff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5552 (2000).
3.J. P. Lu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1297 (1997).
4.J. P. Salvetat, G. A. D. Briggs, J. M. Bonard, R. R. Bacsa, A. J. Kulik, T. Stöckli, N. A. Burnham, and L. Forró, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 944 (1999).
5.D. Hull and T. W. Clyne, An Introduction to Composite Materials (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996).
6.P. M. Ajayan, L. S. Schadler, S. Giannaris, and A. Rubio, Adv. Mater. 12, 750 (2000);
6.C. A. Cooper and R. J. Young, J. Raman Spectrosc. 30, 929 (1999);
6.O. Lourie and H. D. Wagner, J. Mater. Res. 13, 2418 (1998).
7.S. Arepalli, P. Nikolaev, W. Holmes, and C. D. Scott, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 70, 125 (2000).
8.Resins and Versatics Product Technical Bulletins, Shell Chemicals (P. O. Box 2465, Houston, TX 77252, Website: www.shellchemicals.com, 1998).
9.The upper limit for the Raman scattering volume (RSV) in our experiment was set by the depth of focus of the collecting optics used. Simple calculations for a bent beam give that the strain at a depth below the surface relates to the surface strain as where is the radius of bending. In our experiment, of created which corresponded to Therefore, represents well the average strain within the RSV.
10.U. D. Venkateswaram, A. M. Rao, E. Richter, M. Menon, A. Rinzler, R. E. Smalley, and P. C. Eklund, Phys. Rev. B 59, 10 928 (1999).
11.The RB frequency of a nanorope is found to depend on the SWNTs diameter as (see Ref. 15). On the other hand, where is the nearest neighbor carbon–carbon distance are the chiral vector components. Raman scattering from SWNTs is strongly resonant: (Refs. 1 and 12) 514.5 nm line excites mostly the semiconducting SWNTs, whereas that of 632.8 nm is more effective for excitation of the metallic nanotubes (Ref. 12). Metallic are nanotubes with where is an integer (Ref. 1).
12.M. A. Pimenta, A. Marucii, S. A. Empedocles, M. G. Bawendi, E. B. Hanlon, A. M. Rao, P. C. Eklund, R. E. Smalley, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B 58, 16 016 (1998);
12.P. M. Rafailov, H. Jantoljak, and C. Thomsen, Phys. Rev. B 61, 16 179 (2000).
14.S. Reich, H. Jantoljak, and C. Thomsen, Phys. Rev. B 61, 13 389 (2000).
15.L. Alvarez, A. Righi, T. Guillard, S. Rols, E. Anglaret, D. Laplaze, and J. L. Sauvajol, Chem. Phys. Lett. 316, 186 (2000).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month