No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Adsorption of and molecules on carbon nanotubes
1.S. Iijima, Nature (London) 354, 56 (1991).
2.W. A. de Heer, A. Chaterlain, and D. Ugarte, Science 270, 1179 (1995).
3.P. Kim and C. M. Lieber, Science 286, 2148 (1999).
4.J. Kong, N. R. Franklin, C. Chou, M. G. Chaplin, S. Peng, K. Cho, and H. Dai, Science 287, 622 (2000).
5.S. M. Lee and Y. H. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2877 (2000).
6.X. Y. Zhu, S. M. Lee, Y. H. Lee, and T. Frauenheim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2757 (2000);
6.S.-H. Jhi, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1710 (2000);
6.P. G. Collins, K. Bradley, M. Ishigami, and A. Zettle, Science 287, 1081 (2001).
7. is a registered software product of Molecular Simulation Inc.;
7.B. Delley, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 508 (1990), and other references therein.
8.For the definition of CNT, see M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and P. C. Eklund, Science of Fullerenes and Carbon Nanotubes (Academic, New York, 1996), Chap. 19.
9.An 80 atom unit cell was chosen after considering the size effects of the unit cell. We calculated the (10, 0) CNT of a 120 atom (12 layer) unit cell. We found that the change of the binding energy was less than 0.05 eV/atom on increasing the size of the unit cell.
10.J. W. G. Wildöer, L. C. Venema, A. G. Rinzler, R. E. Smalley, and C. Dekker, Nature (London) 391, 59 (1998).
11.This value was calculated from the equation in Ref. 10, where is 2.7 eV, obtained from the experimental fitting, is the nearest-neighbor C–C distance (1.42 Å), and is the diameter of the CNT (7.91 Å).
12.S. Peng and K. Cho, Nanotechnology 11, 57 (2000).
13.P. Sjövall, S. K. So, B. Kasemo, R. Franchy, and W. Ho, Chem. Phys. Lett. 171, 125 (1990).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month