Local structure of implanted B in amorphous Si
1.W. Fuhs, in Amorphous and Microcrystalline Semiconductor Devices, edited by J. Kanicki (Artech House, London, 1992), Vol. 2.
2.M. Stutzmann, D. K. Biegelsen, and R. A. Street, Phys. Rev. B 35, 5666 (1987).
3.S. Kalbitzer, G. Müller, P. G. LeComber, and W. E. Spear, Philos. Mag. B 41, 439 (1980).
4.S. G. Greenbaum, W. E. Carlos, and P. C. Taylor, Solid State Commun. 43, 663 (1982).
5.J. B. Boyce and S. E. Ready, Phys. Rev. B 38, 11008 (1988).
6.B. Ittermann, G. Welker, F. Kroll, F. Mai, K. Marbach, and D. Peters, Phys. Rev. B 59, 2700 (1999).
7.This particular substate population is a rather accidental result of the nuclear reaction. It depends sensitively on beam energy and recoil angle, as shown by M. Tanaka, S. Ochi, T. Minamisono, A. Mizobuchi, and K. Sugimoto, Nucl. Phys. A 263, 1 (1976).
8.H. Metzner, G. Sulzer, W. Seelinger, B. Ittermann, H.-P. Frank, B. Fischer, K.-H. Ergezinger, R. Dippel, E. Diehl, H.-J. Stöckmann, and H. Ackermann, Phys. Rev. B 42, 11419 (1990).
9.A weak broadening of the DQ transitions, depending on the H content of the samples, is indeed observed. From a more extended analysis, to be presented in a forthcoming publication, we can exclude close B–H pairs, however, as the origin of this magnetic line broadening. The observed signatures are fully consistent with the assumption of randomly distributed H in the samples without any preferential pairing.
10.P. Raghavan, in At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 42, 189 (1989).
11.R. A. Street and K. Winer, in Electronic Structure and Properties of Semiconductors, Materials Science and Technology, edited by W. Schröter (VCH, Weinheim, 1991), Vol. 4, p. 493.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month