Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Two charge states of dominant acceptor in unintentionally doped GaN: Evidence from photoluminescence study
1.H. Morkoç, Mat. Sci. Eng. R 33, 135 (2001), and references therein.
2.T. Ogino and M. Aoki, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 19, 2395 (1980).
3.T. Suski, P. Perlin, H. Teisseyre, M. Leszczynski, I. Grzegory, I. Jun, M. Bockowski, S. Porowski, and T. D. Moustakas, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2188 (1995).
4.K. Saarinen, T. Laine, S. Kuisma, J. Nissilä, P. Hautojärvi, L. Dobrzynski, J. M. Baranowski, K. Pakula, R. Stepniewski, M. Wojdak, A. Wysmolek, T. Suski, M. Leszczynski, I. Grzegory, and S. Porowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3030 (1997).
5.J. Neugebauer and C. G. Van de Walle, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 503 (1996).
6.T. Mattila and R. M. Nieminen, Phys. Rev. B 55, 9571 (1997).
7.K. Saarinen, T. Suski, I. Grzegory, and D. C. Look, Phys. Rev. B 64, 233201 (2001).
8.M. A. Reshchikov, G.-C. Yi, and B. W. Wessels, Phys. Rev. B 59, 13176 (1999).
9.For deconvolution, we first neglected the contribution of the YL band at the highest and chose the initial shape of the GL band as the combined band shape at This band shape was deduced from the several spectra at low to obtain the shape of the YL band that enables us to fit the combined spectra at different with varying only intensities of the YL and GL bands. This procedure was repeated several times to achieve the best fit.
10.M. A. Reshchikov and R. Y. Korotkov, Phys. Rev. B 64, 115205 (2001).
11.O. Brandt, H. Yang, and K. H. Ploog, Phys. Rev. B 54, 5215 (1996).
12.D. Huang, F. Yun, P. Visconti, M. A. Reshchikov, D. Wang, H. Morkoç, D. L. Rode, L. A. Farina, Ç. Kurdak, K. T. Tsen, S. S. Park and K. Y. Lee, Solid-State Electron. 45, 711 (2001).
13.The excitation density was converted into generation rate by assuming that the effective thickness of the layer subjected to excitation was defined not by absorption coefficient but by diffusion length of holes in the studied sample. The hole diffusion length was taken as 1 μm.
14.M. A. Reshchikov, H. Morkoç, S. S. Park, and K. Y. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 2882 (2001).
15.K. Saarinen (private communication).
16.W. Grieshaber, E. F. Schubert, I. D. Goepfert, R. F. Karlicek, Jr., M. J. Schurman, and C. Tran, J. Appl. Phys. 80, 4615 (1996).
17.O. Brandt, H. J. Wunsche, H. Yang, R. Klann, H.-J. Wüllhäuser, and K. H. Ploog, J. Cryst. Growth 189/190, 790 (1998).
18.F. Binet, J. Y. Duboz, E. Rosencher, F. Scholz, and V. Härle, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 1202 (1996).
19.J. Elsner, R. Jones, M. I. Heggie, P. K. Sitch, M. Haugk, Th. Frauenheim, S. Öberg, and P. R. Briddon, Phys. Rev. B 58, 12571 (1998).
20.S. J. Xu, G. Li, S. J. Chua, X. C. Wang, and W. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 2451 (1998);
20.S. A. Brown, R. J. Reeves, C. S. Haase, R. Cheung, C. Kirchner, and M. Kamp, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 3285 (1999).
21.M. A. Reshchikov, P. Visconti, and H. Morkoç, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 177 (2001).
22.M. A. Reshchikov, H. Morkoç, S. S. Park, and K. Y. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 3041 (2001).
Article metrics loading...