No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Determination of size and composition of optically active CdZnSe/ZnBeSe quantum dots
1.D. Litvinov, A. Rosenauer, D. Gerthsen, and N. N. Ledentsov, Phys. Rev. B 61, 16819 (2000).
2.D. Litvinov, D. Gerthsen, A. Rosenauer, H. Preis, E. Kurtz, and C. Klingshirn, Phys. Status Solidi B 224, 147 (2001).
3.M. Strassburg, Th. Deniozou, A. Hoffmann, R. Heitz, U. W. Pohl, D. Bimberg, D. Litvinov, A. Rosenauer, D. Gerthsen, S. Schwedhelm, K. Lischka, and D. Schikora, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 685 (2000).
4.S. P. Guo, X. Zhou, O. Maksimov, M. C. Tamargo, C. Chi, A. Couzis, C. Maldarelli, I. L. Kuskovsky, and G. F. Neumark, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 19, 1635 (2001).
5.M. Keim, M. Korn, J. Seufert, G. Bacher, A. Forchel, G. Landwehr, S. Ivanov, S. Sorokin, A. A. Sitnikova, T. V. Shubina, A. Toropov, and A. Waag, J. Appl. Phys. 88, 7051 (2000).
6.Previous time-resolved PL studies of these QDs [X. Zhou, M. C. Tamargo, S. P. Guo, and Y. C. Chen, J. Electron. Mater. 32, 736 (2003)] show that the decay time stays constant up to =150 K, suggesting zero-dimensional quantum confinement. Therefore, we consider these QDs to be spherical. Since the estimated QD sizes are smaller than the Bohr radius in CdSe, corresponding to the strong quantum confinement case, the Coulomb energy of excitons has also been ignored.
7.C. G. Van de Walle, Phys. Rev. B 39, 1871 (1989).
8.We note that for spherical QDs there is no shear component of strain; however, since the spherical shape is an approximation, including the shear effect for calculation is expected to represent a more realistic case.
9.C. Chauvet, E. Tournié, and J.-P. Faurie, Phys. Rev. B 61, 5332 (2000).
10. and are elastic stiffness constants; and are deformation potentials of the conduction and valence band edges, and that of the band gap, respectively; and are the effective masses for heavy holes and electrons, respectively; is the shear deformation potential; is the LO phonon energy; is a phenomenological parameter describing the phonon dispersion and is the pressure dependence of
11.S. H. Wei and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 60, 5404 (1999).
12.N. Samarth, H. Luo, J. K. Furdyna, R. G. Alonso, Y. R. Lee, A. K. Ramdas, S. B. Qadri, and N. Otsuka, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1163 (1990).
13.H. Hartmann, R. Mach, and B. Selle, in Current Topics in Materials Science, edited by E. Kaldis (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982), Vol. 9.
14.V. Pellegrini, R. Atamasov, A. Tredicucci, F. Beltram, C. Amzulini, L. Sobra, L. Vanzetti, and A. Francioso, Phys. Rev. B 51, 5176 (1995).
15.D. Kranzer, Phys. Status Solidi A 26, 11 (1974).
16.J. Schroeder and P. D. Persans, J. Lumin. 70, 69 (1996).
17.F. Widulle, S. Kramp, N. M. Pyka, A. Göbel, T. Ruf, A. Debernardi, R. Lauck, and M. Cardona, Physica B 263/264, 448 (1999).
18.Y.-N. Hwang, S. Shin, H. L. Park, S.-H. Park, U. Kim, H. S. Jeong, E.-J. Shin, and D. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 54, 15120 (1996).
19.The CdSe LO phonon energy at the Brillouin zone edge is ∼24.8 meV (see Ref. 17) however, it increases due to both compressive strain and Zn interdiffusion.
20.In our sample there is a GaAs/AlAs superlattice grown on GaAs substrate (see Ref. 4), which is not expected to change the GaAs LO phonon energy significantly [see, e.g., P. Y. Yu and M. Cardona, Fundamentals of Semiconductors (Springer, Berling, 1999)].
21.H. Rho, H. E. Jackson, S. Lee, M. Dobrowolska, and J. K. Furdyna, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15641 (2000).
22.M. C. Klein, F. Hache, D. Ricard, and C. Flytzanis, Phys. Rev. B 42, 11123 (1990).
23.Y.-N. Hwang, S.-H. Park, and D. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 59, 7285 (1999).
24.M. Lowisch, M. Rabe, F. Kreller, and F. Henneberger, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 2489 (1999).
25.H. Rho, L. M. Robinson, L. M. Smith, H. E. Jackson, S. Lee, M. Dobrowolska, and J. K. Furdyna, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1813 (2000).
26.E. Roca, C. Trallero-Giner, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B 49, 13704 (1994).
27.M. P. Chamberlain, C. Trallero-Giner, and M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. B 51, 1680 (1995).
28.H. Fu, L.-W. Wang, and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5568 (1999).
29.D. V. Melnikov and W. B. Fowler, Phys. Rev. B 64, 245320 (2001).
30.R. Ruppin and R. Englman, Rep. Prog. Phys. 33, 149 (1970).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month