1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Kelvin probe force microscopy on corona charged oxidized semiconductor surfaces
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.1818343
/content/aip/journal/apl/85/20/10.1063/1.1818343
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/85/20/10.1063/1.1818343
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(a) Schematic of corona charge surface voltage measurement process: First a layer of charged molecules from a corona ion source is deposited (left). To measure the resulting surface voltage, a Kelvin probe is scanned across the surface, monitoring its potential (right). (b) The energy band diagram of an oxidized -type semiconductor sample showing the corona ions deposited on the sample surface (⊕) and the charge sheet (−) created just below the oxide layer. denotes the Fermi energy level and and the energy at the bottom of the conduction band and the top of the valence band, respectively.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Cross section analysis of a contact potential map of the corona charged oxide on wafer B after the center part of has been scanned ten times in KPFM mode. The markers on the map (a) indicate the origin of the cross section data plotted in (b). The data reveal a change in the surface potential of about after repeated scanning in the -wide center area relative to the surrounding area. This is due to a partial discharge of the corona ions in the center area during the surface topography scan (not shown) when the AFM tip is in semi-contact with the surface.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Contact potential difference as measured by the KPFM vs measured in the same spot by the macroscopic SKP on wafers A and B, respectively. Also shown are the correlation coefficient and the standard deviation of the data from the linear fit. The axis intersects were determined to (A) and (B). They are likely related to the work function difference between the Pt and highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) calibration surfaces used to calibrate the SKP and KPFM measurements.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/apl/85/20/10.1063/1.1818343
2004-11-16
2014-04-23
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Kelvin probe force microscopy on corona charged oxidized semiconductor surfaces
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/85/20/10.1063/1.1818343
10.1063/1.1818343
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM