1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Time-division multiplexing of high-resolution x-ray microcalorimeters: Four pixels and beyond
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.1823041
/content/aip/journal/apl/85/20/10.1063/1.1823041
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/85/20/10.1063/1.1823041
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Error and feedback signals vs time for two multiplexed pixels. Pixel A shows the rising edge of a pulse from an x-ray impact at time 0. The feedback signal and the row address signal (not pictured) for pixel A are turned on at the beginning of the frame. After a settling time, in this example , the error signal, is averaged over the sampling time , and then pixel A is turned off and B is turned on. The pixels have different quiescent signal levels due to slight differences in the sensor and first-stage-SQUID operating conditions.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Measured TES resolution vs for two multiplexed pixels. The top axis gives as calculated using Eq. (1) with . The poorer resolution to the left of the plot is due to being too short to allow switching transients to decay fully before sampling. The degradation to the right is due to taking too few samples on the pulse rise, where the signal changes the fastest.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Histogrammed pulse-energy spectra with overlaid fits to the complex for four multiplexed TES pixels. The spectra are offset vertically by . Nonmultiplexed resolution is (FWHM); the slight degradation to an average resolution of is well explained by the and effects, and can be significantly reduced by straightforward upgrades to the multiplexer.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Energy resolution vs number of pixels for the current multiplexer (solid) and various modifications (dashed). The curves show the predicted resolution based on effects measured in Fig. 2 and also on SQUID noise aliasing. Data (circles) are for , 3, 4, and 8 (the data point for 8 pixels uses four blank pixel periods, and thus simulates the timing of multiplexing eight pixels with the four available sensors). The dashed curves are predictions for various open-loop system bandwidths, and also include twice the pulse , SQUID amplifier noise half that in the current multiplexer chip, data-acquisition firmware correction for propagation delays, and optimized coupling between the TES and first-stage SQUID. More involved upgrades, including transmission-line optimization of the couplings among the cold amplifier stages and a substantial upgrade in the clock rate of the digital-feedback electronics, could allow a usable of up to .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/apl/85/20/10.1063/1.1823041
2004-11-16
2014-04-23
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Time-division multiplexing of high-resolution x-ray microcalorimeters: Four pixels and beyond
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/85/20/10.1063/1.1823041
10.1063/1.1823041
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM