banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Metrology of steel micronozzles using x-ray propagation-based phase-enhanced microimaging
Rent this article for
View: Figures


Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Sketch and image of a prototype and research single-orifice fuel injector micronozzle. This study focuses on the tip part of the micronozzle where the fuel exits the orifice. The diameter of the orifice has a nominal value of . The shape and diameter of the sac and the thinned tip depends on the specific design.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Normalized absorption for a 3-mm-thick iron (solid line) and the minimum detectable thickness of iron for 1% (dotted line) and 2% (dashed line) absorption contrast as a function of x-ray energy.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Comparison of absorption-based and phase-enhanced radiography of a steel micronozzle: (a) absorption and (b) phase-enhanced images collected using 70 keV x-rays with sample-to-detector distances of 10 mm and 1.8 m, respectively, and 5 s exposure times (c) and (d) magnified views of the boxed regions in (a) and (b), respectively, (e) and (f) numerical simulations of the absorption and phase-enhanced images, respectively, for a model with parameters given in the text. The field of view in the magnified images (c) and (d) is . The arrows in (d) indicate the two regions with observable fabrication imperfections which cannot be resolved in the absorption-based radiograph (c). The ”zingers” in the images are due to x-rays hitting the CCD directly. They can be avoided by adding a mirror so that the CCD is not in-line with the beam.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Observed fabrication imperfections by phase-enhanced imaging: (a) an asymmetry in the shape of the sac in a ”hydroground” micronozzle (2 s exposure). The bright regions at the lower corners are artifacts due to sticking of an optical shutter in the detector for the no-sample reference image; (b) a machining imperfection in the sac-orifice transition region, indicated by the arrow (0.8 s exposure); (c) a machining imperfection (1 s exposure) in the same micronozzle as (b), but further back from the orifice, indicated by the arrow.


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Metrology of steel micronozzles using x-ray propagation-based phase-enhanced microimaging