No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Electric field enhancement by a nanometer-scaled conical metal tip in the context of scattering-type near-field optical microscopy
8.W. X. Sun and Z. X. Shen, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20, 2254 (2003).
9.R. Bachelot, F. H’Dhili, D. Barchiesi, G. Lerondel, R. Fikri, P. Royer, N. Landraud, J. Peretti, F. Chaput, G. Lampel, J. P. Boilot, and K. Lahlil, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 2060 (2003).
11.J. Venermo and A. Sihvola, J. Electrost. 63, 101 (2005).
12.C. Kanyinda-Malu and R. M. de la Cruz, Surf. Sci. 529, 503 (2004).
13.D. S. Jones, Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 52, 311 (1999).
15.Z. P. Liao, H. L. Wong, B. P. Yang, and Y. F. Yuan, Sci. Sin., Ser. A 27, 1063 (1984).
16.Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, edited by E. D. Palik (Academic, New York, 1985).
17.U. Kreibig and M. Vollmer, Optical Properties of Metal Clusters (Springer, Berlin, 1995).
20.The similar effect (the presence of a nontrivial optimal angle) for achieving the maximal field enhancement for a silver droplet-like particle with a sharp protrusion was reported in H. Xu, J. Aizpurua, M. Käll, and P. Apell, Phys. Rev. E 62, 4318 (2000) where retardation effects were not considered.
21.This results from the retardation effect which is especially pronounced for the long tips. At the same time, a dipole nature of the main peaks can be illustrated by calculating the field (or charge) distributions at the peak wavelengths which are not presented here.
22.Electromagnetic and Acoustic Scattering by Simple Shapes, edited by J. J. Bowman, T. B. A. Senior, and P. L. E. Uslenghi (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969).
25.J. van Bladel, Proc. IEEE 71, 901 (1983).
26.S. Hayashi, Top. Appl. Phys. 81, 71 (2001).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month