1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Reduced buckling in one dimension versus two dimensions of a compressively strained film on a compliant substrate
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2204456
/content/aip/journal/apl/88/20/10.1063/1.2204456
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/88/20/10.1063/1.2204456

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(Color online) Buckling amplitude, measured by AFM as rms surface roughness, versus anneal time at , for 1D (blue circles) and 2D (black squares) buckling. Dotted lines show the exponential growth of buckling using extracted values of . Short solid lines indicate the maximum observed buckling amplitude . The inset schematic shows a SiGe film, initially flat, releasing its stress upon high temperature anneal via two simultaneous, competing mechanisms indicated by the arrows: lateral expansion to generate a flat, relaxed film; and buckling (vertical expansion) to create a rough surface.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(Color online) AFM images of SiGe on BPSG islands (Fig. 1 inset): (a) 2D buckling at the center of a square island, ; (b) and (c) 1D buckling at the center of rectangular islands, , aligned to the ⟨110⟩ and ⟨100⟩ crystal directions, as indicated, after a anneal at . The AFM scan size is and the -axis scale is .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(Color online) Average strain energy density of 1D and 2D buckled films vs buckling amplitude. The energy curves are plotted for the measured buckling wavelengths, as indicated. Arrows indicate the buckling amplitude at the minimum energy equilibrium state of the film, .

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Summary of measured and modeled buckling parameters for 2D and 1D buckling. The values predicted by modeling are in parentheses.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/apl/88/20/10.1063/1.2204456
2006-05-17
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Reduced buckling in one dimension versus two dimensions of a compressively strained film on a compliant substrate
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/88/20/10.1063/1.2204456
10.1063/1.2204456
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM