1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Single wall carbon nanotube double quantum dot
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2402887
/content/aip/journal/apl/89/23/10.1063/1.2402887
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/89/23/10.1063/1.2402887
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(Color online) (a) Optical image of four potential devices consisting of one common source electrode, three common top-gate electrodes, and four individual drain electrodes. On the left hand side of the source electrode an island of catalyst material is positioned from where the carbon nanotubes grow. (b) Atomic force microscope micrograph of the region indicated by the black rectangle in (a). To the left (close to the catalyst island) several tubes can be seen, but only one tube has grown several micrometers away from the island (indicated with white arrows). Source and drain electrodes consisting of titanium, and three top-gate electrodes consisting of five layers of air-oxidized aluminum and titanium, are positioned directly on top of the tube. Some resist residue can be seen around some of the leads. Insert: Schematic side view of the device. (c) Current through the device as function of voltage applied to the back gate at room temperature, and with source-drain voltage.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(Color online) (a) Bias spectroscopy plot of differential conductance vs source-drain voltage and voltage applied to G1, with , , and at . The white dashed lines are guidelines to the eye, indicating charge degeneracy lines. The addition energies of each quantum dot are indicated with green arrows. (b) Schematic figures of the hole transport through the double quantum dot at positions indicated with letters in (a). Solid and dashed lines are filled and empty hole states, respectively. The coupling energy is here neglected since it is much smaller than the addition energies (see below).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(Color online) Charge stability diagrams at of the measured current as function of , and , with , , and . (a) Honeycomb pattern with relative number of holes in each QD indicated with green numbers. The white dashed lines are guidelines to the eye. (b) Closeup of one set of triple points at the position indicated with the relative hole numbers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/apl/89/23/10.1063/1.2402887
2006-12-06
2014-04-18
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Single wall carbon nanotube double quantum dot
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/89/23/10.1063/1.2402887
10.1063/1.2402887
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM