1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
f
X-ray stability and response of polymeric photodiodes for imaging applications
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/aip/journal/apl/92/2/10.1063/1.2834364
1.
1.M. J. Yaffe and J. A. Rowlands, Phys. Med. Biol. 42, 1 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/42/1/001
2.
2.J. P. Ponpon, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 551, 15 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2005.07.038
3.
3.M. Hoheisel and L. Baetz, Thin Solid Films 383, 132 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01592-3
4.
4.J.-P. Moy, Thin Solid Films 337, 213 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(98)01179-1
5.
5.T. Someya, Y. Kato, S. Iba, Y. Noguchi, T. Sekitani, H. Kawaguchi, and T. Sakurai, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 52, 2502 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TED.2005.857935
6.
6.R. A. Street, J. Graham, Z. D. Popovic, A. Hor, S. Ready, and J. Ho, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 299-302, 1240 (2002).
7.
7.A. C. Arias, S. E. Ready, R. Lujan, W. S. Wong, K. E. Paul, A. Salleo, M. L. Chabinyc, R. Apte, R. A. Street, Y. Wu, P. Liu, and B. Ong, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 3304 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1801673
8.
8.P. Schilinsky, C. Waldauf, J. Hauch, and C. J. Brabec, Thin Solid Films 451–452, 105 (2004).
9.
9.J. J. M. Halls, C. A. Walsh, N. C. Greenham, E. A. Marseglia, R. H. Friend, S. C. Moratti, and A. B. Holmes, Nature (London) 376, 498 (1995).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/376498a0
10.
10.G. Yu, K. Pakbaz, and A. J. Heeger, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 3422 (1994).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.111260
11.
11.J. Huang, H. Wang, Y. Kim, A. J. deMello, D. D. C. Bradley, and J. C. deMello, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 3904 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b607016g
12.
12.Y. Li, L. E. Antonuk, Y. El–Mohri, Q. Zhao, H. Du, A. Sawant, and Y. Wang, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 064501 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2179149
13.
13.R. A. Street, M. Mulato, R. Lau, and J. Ho, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 4193 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1380733
14.
14.L.-L. Chua, M. Dipankar, S. Sivaramakrishnan, X. Gao, D. Qi, A. T. S. Wee, and P. K. H. Ho, Langmuir 22, 8587 (2006).
15.
15.H. Ahn, D. W. Oblas, and J. E. Whitten, Macromolecules 37, 3381 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma030589x
16.
16.M. Atreya, S. Li, E. T. Kang, K. G. Neoh, Z. H. Ma, K. L. Tan, and W. Huan, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 65, 287 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(99)00018-X
17.
17.M. Wolszczak, J. Kroh, and M. M. Abdel–Hamid, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 45, 41 (1995).
18.
18.E. A. B. Silva, J. F. Borin, P. Nicolucci, C. F. O. Graeff, T. G. Netto, and R. F. Bianchi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 131902 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1891300
19.
19.S. C. Graham, R. H. Friend, S. Fung, and S. C. Moratti, Synth. Met. 84, 903 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0379-6779(96)04204-X
20.
20.C. R. Newman, D. C. Frisbie, D. A. da Silva Filho, J.-L. Bredas, P. C. Ewbank, and K. R. Mann, Chem. Mater. 16, 4436 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm049391x
21.
21.M. Redecker, D. D. C. Bradley, M. Inbasekaran, W. W. Wu, and E. P. Woo, Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 11, 241 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199903)11:3<241::AID-ADMA241>3.0.CO;2-J
22.
22.L.-L. Chua, J. Zaumseil, J.-F. Chang, E. C.-W. Ou, P. K. H. Ho, H. Sirringhaus, and R. H. Friend, Nature (London) 434, 195 (2005).
23.
23.W. Ma, C. Yang, X. Gong, K. Lee, and A. J. Heeger, Adv. Funct. Mater. 15, 1617 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200500211
24.
24.C. R. Newman, J. Blakesley, R. Speller, and H. Sirringhaus, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 142105 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2785946
25.
25.R. A. B. Devine, M. Ling, A. B. Mallik, M. Roberts, and Z. Bao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 151907 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2194894
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/92/2/10.1063/1.2834364
Loading
/content/aip/journal/apl/92/2/10.1063/1.2834364
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/apl/92/2/10.1063/1.2834364
2008-01-16
2014-10-22

Abstract

The x-ray stability of photodiodes made of poly(9,9-di--octylfluorene-co-benzothiadiazole):perylene diimide, poly[2,7-(9,9-di--octylfluorene)-co-(1,4-phenylene-[(4-sec-butylphenyl)imino]-1,4-phenylene)]:perylene diimide and poly(3-hexylthiophene):([6,6]-phenylC61-butyric acid methyl ester) (P3HT:PCBM) blends has been examined up to lifetime doses equivalent to those used in medicalx-ray digital imaging applications. Dark currents and external quantum efficiencies (EQEs) are not significantly affected after exposure to . Only in the case of P3HT:PCBM is a significant loss in EQE (17% of the initial value) observed. Possible reasons for the observed changes are proposed. When a scintillation layer is attached to the devices, a linear dependence of the photocurrent on the x-ray dose rate is observed for the three material systems.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/apl/92/2/1.2834364.html;jsessionid=2m5ln80g21361.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/aip/journal/apl/92/2/10.1063/1.2834364&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/apl
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: X-ray stability and response of polymeric photodiodes for imaging applications
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/92/2/10.1063/1.2834364
10.1063/1.2834364
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM