No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Bulk magnetic domain structures visualized by neutron dark-field imaging
1.A. Hubert and R. Schäfer, Magnetic Domains (Springer, Berlin, 1998).
2.H. Hopster and H. P. Oepen, Magnetic Microscopy of Nanostructures (Springer, Berlin, 2005).
4.R. Schäfer and S. Schinnerling, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 215–216, 140 (2000).
5.O. Halpern and T. Holstein, Phys. Rev. 59, 940 (1941).
7.M. Schlenker, W. Bauspiess, W. Gräff, U. Bonse, and H. Rauch, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 15–18, 1507 (1980).
8.S. Nakatani, H. Tomimitsu, T. Takahashi, and S. Kikuta, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 31, L1137 (1992).
9.H. Rauch and S. A. Werner, Neutron Interferometry (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000).
11.J. Baruchel, Physica B (Amsterdam) 192, 79 (1993).
14.C. Grünzweig, C. David, O. Bunk, M. Dierolf, G. Frei, G. Kühne, J. Kohlbrecher, R. Schäfer, P. Lejcek, H. M. R. Rønnow, and F. Pfeiffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 025504 (2008).
15.F. Pfeiffer, M. Bech, O. Bunk, P. Kraft, E. F. Eikenberry, Ch. Brönnimann, C. Grünzweig, and C. David, Nat. Mater. 7, 134 (2008).
17.F. Pfeiffer, O. Bunk, C. Schulze-Briese, A. Diaz, T. Weitkamp, C. David, F. van der Veen, I. Vartanyants, and I. K. Robinson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 164801 (2005).
18.M. Strobl, C. Grünzweig, A. Hilger, I. Manke, N. Kardjilov, C. David, and F. Pfeiffer, “Neutron dark-field tomography,” Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published).
20.The (110)-oriented FeSi (Fe) disk had a thickness of and was cut from a Goss-oriented transformer steel with a diameter of 10 mm. We note that surface polishing was only necessary to acquire the Kerr images; neutron DFI contrast can equally well be obtained on unpolished samples.
22.The images were recorded using a thick Li-6/ZnS converter and fluorescence screen with a 1:1 optical lens system and a cooled charge coupled device (Fingerlake Instrumentation) (, pixel size of ). The effective spatial resolution was mainly determined by the intrinsic blurring in the scintillation screen to (Ref. 21). A typical exposure time for a single raw image was 30 s; typically four or eight images were taken to yield one DCI.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month