1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Multiple impact regimes in liquid environment dynamic atomic force microscopy
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2976438
/content/aip/journal/apl/93/9/10.1063/1.2976438
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/93/9/10.1063/1.2976438
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Numerical simulation of the photodiode deflection for the Biolever in water tapping on mica. Examples of oscillations with (a) single, (b) double, and (c) triple impacts correspond to , , and , respectively.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Numerical simulations of phase versus amplitude ratio for the (a) Biolever and (b) MAClever approaching a stiff sample (mica, ) and a soft sample (). Grazing trajectories with two (G2) and three (G3) impacts mark the onset of the corresponding multiple impact regime.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Experimental phase vs amplitude ratio on mica and a single layer of PM using the MAClever (, ) in buffer solution. Nonsmooth points in the phase are attributed to grazing trajectories which mark the onset of the indicated multiple impact regime. Shown in the inset (Ref. 20) is the topography of PM deposited on mica and the approximate locations where the phase curves were extracted.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/apl/93/9/10.1063/1.2976438
2008-09-04
2014-04-18
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Multiple impact regimes in liquid environment dynamic atomic force microscopy
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/93/9/10.1063/1.2976438
10.1063/1.2976438
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM