No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Improving optical performance of inverted organic solar cells by microcavity effect
3.S. E. Shaheen, D. S. Ginley, and G. E. Jabbour, MRS Bull. 30,10 (2005).
10.J. van de Lagemaat, T. M. Barnes, G. Rumbles, S. E. Shaneen, T. J. Coutts, C. Weeks, I. Levitsky, J. Peltola, and P. Glatkowsky, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 233503 (2006).
11.K. Schulze, C. Uhrich, R. Schueppel, K. Leo, M. Pfeiffer, E. Brier, E. Reinhold, and P. Baeuerle, Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 18, 2872 (2006).
21.E. Palik and G. G. Dand, Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (Academic, San Diego, 1998).
Article metrics loading...
Optical simulations have been performed to investigate the performance of inverted organic solar cells with metal-mirror microcavity structure formed by central active layer sandwiched between semitransparent silver (Ag) cathode and thick Ag anode. Compared to nearly optimized noncavity devices with indium tin oxide cathode, the total absorbed photons (TAPs) in a 70 nm-thick active layer for cavity devices can be improved by 16.3% due to microcavity effect. Furthermore, an improvement of over 10% in TAPs can be obtained when thin Ag layer is optimized to be 10–16 nm thick, indicating thin Ag layer is a good choice as transparent electrode material.
Full text loading...
Most read this month