1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Memory effect of nanomagnets embedded inside a Mn-diluted Ge matrix
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3264076
/content/aip/journal/apl/95/19/10.1063/1.3264076
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/95/19/10.1063/1.3264076
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

XRD scan revealing the formation of nanomagnets. Beside the main peaks from Ge(004) and Ge(002), the diffraction peaks of (111), (002), (310), (222), and (004) are clearly visible.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Temperature dependent memory effect in the dc magnetization. The dashed line (red) is measured during cooling in 50 Oe at a cooling rate of 1 K/min, while the solid line (black) is measured in 50 Oe with the same cooling rate but with a stop of 2 h at 200, 150, 100, 50, and 20 K. The field is cut off during stop. The magnetization change before and after stopping is observed at 150 K. The dotted line (blue) is measured with continuous heating at the same rate after the previous cooling protocol. Inset (a): Hysteresis loop measured at 5 K. Inset (b): time dependent remanent magnetization measured after cooling from 300 to 100 K with a field of 50 Oe. Scattered symbols are experimental data and the solid line (blue) is a fitting using the stretched-exponential function [Eq. (1) ].

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Magnetic relaxation after field cooling (a) with temporary cooling at and (b) with temporary heating at . The insets plot the same data vs the total time spent at 100 K. The relaxation curve during is the continuation of that during after temporary cooling, but not after temporary heating. After temporary heating, no memory effect is observable.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Comparison between different magnetization quantities depending on temperature (a) ZFC/FC curves using a field of 50 Oe. The magnetic remanence is also shown. To measure the magnetic remanence, a field of 8000 Oe was applied to saturate the magnetization at 5 K and the remanence was measured during warming in a zero field. (b) The differential of magnetic remanence vs temperature revealing a broad minimum indicated by the arrow. (c) The magnetization change before and after stopping ( as shown in Fig. 2 ) and the relaxation time obtained by fitting using Eq. (1) .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/apl/95/19/10.1063/1.3264076
2009-11-12
2014-04-23
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Memory effect of Mn5Ge3 nanomagnets embedded inside a Mn-diluted Ge matrix
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/95/19/10.1063/1.3264076
10.1063/1.3264076
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM