1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Improving the coherence time of superconducting coplanar resonators
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3273372
/content/aip/journal/apl/95/23/10.1063/1.3273372
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/95/23/10.1063/1.3273372

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Description of resonator devices. (a) Photomicrograph of a wrap-geometry resonator (circled) coupled to a qubit through a few femtofarad capacitor and a microwave drive through a sub femtofarad capacitor for measurement. Resonator for measurement is coupled to a second microwave drive through a sub femtofarad capacitor and disconnected from the qubit. (b) Illustrations (not to scale) of different geometries used for resonators. The total length of coplanar lines are all about 8.8 mm. (c) A straight resonator (circled) coupled to a qubit and a microwave drive for . Resonator for is coupled to a second microwave drive and disconnected from the qubit. (d) Cross-section of the coplanar resonator showing the center trace width , and the gap separation between the center trace and the ground plane.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) Plot of vs temperature at high excitation power for Re resonators with different center-trace widths , as indicated. (b) Fractional variations of the resonance frequency vs temperature for resonators shown in (a). The variation scales inversely with , characteristic of kinetic inductance. Inset shows the low temperature regime where a monotonic change of is observed down to the lowest temperature. Lines are guides to the eye.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) vs resonator voltage (with ) for Re resonators of different gap widths . Lines are fits to the data. (b) Same as (a), but for Al resonators. Note that for Al is systematically lower than for Re. (c) Results from a fit to a power-independent (diamonds) and power-dependent (squares), vs . Open (filled) symbols are for Re (Al). Corresponding trace width is shown on top scale. Solid lines are fits using from surface TLS loss. Dashed lines are guide to the eye.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) Normalized vs the applied cooling field for Re resonators of different trace widths . (b) Normalized vs the applied field, as measured with a qubit, for a Re resonator with and . Data for the resonator and qubit is shown. Lines are drawn as a guide to the eye.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Resonator parameters. The thickness of the metal films are 110–130 nm, and widths and were chosen to give a characteristic impedance, except for the resonator. is quoted at low power, , and is determined via qubit-resonator swap experiments.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/apl/95/23/10.1063/1.3273372
2009-12-11
2014-04-23
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Improving the coherence time of superconducting coplanar resonators
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/95/23/10.1063/1.3273372
10.1063/1.3273372
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM