1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Integrated acoustic and magnetic separation in microfluidic channels
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3275577
/content/aip/journal/apl/95/25/10.1063/1.3275577
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/95/25/10.1063/1.3275577
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Overview of the IAMS device separation principle. The target and nontarget particles are introduced at the sample inlet alongside a buffer stream. Next, both acoustic and magnetic target particles are acoustically separated. The target particles are then magnetically separated by a series of microfabricated ferromagnetic structures. As a result, the acoustic and magnetic targets are eluted through two independent outlets.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) Photograph of the assembled device, showing the acoustic and magnetic components and fluidic connections. (b) Cross-sectional schematic of the device, showing the relative locations of the magnets, micropatterned Ni and piezo, and the orientation of the acoustic field. (c) Schematic of the experimental setup. The sample containing acoustic target, magnetic target, and nontarget particles is loaded into inlet tubing and introduced alongside buffer solution into the IAMS device via dual programmable syringe pumps (PhD 2000, Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA). The microfabricated ferromagnetic structures within the device are magnetized by three neodymium iron boron permanent magnets. Acoustic resonances are excited by a single piezotransducer that is attached onto the back of the chip and driven by a function generator (33120A, Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA) and custom-built amplifier based on an LT1210 op-amp (Linear Technology, Milpitas, CA). The separation process is observed via an inverted fluorescence microscope for monitoring during separation. The purities of the eluted fractions are analyzed via flow cytometry (FACSAria, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Simulation of acoustic and magnetic fields within the IAMS device (COMSOL Multiphysics, Comsol Inc., Los Angeles, CA). (a) Simulation of the long-range magnetic field from the external magnets shows that within the cross-section of the device. (b) Simulation of the short-range magnetic field due to a microfabricated Ni element. Contours show magnetic field gradient magnitude, arrows show gradient direction. (c) The acoustic resonance is locally disrupted by modulating the width of the microchannel. Longitudinal acoustic modes are indicated by the dashed lines.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) Separation of a mixture of acoustic target, magnetic target, and nonmagnetic nontarget, showing enrichment to very high purity starting from rare amount of each target. (b) Separation of a mixture of acoustic target, magnetic target, and magnetic nontarget, demonstrating that particles entering the magnetic outlet must respond to a combination of both separation forces.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/apl/95/25/10.1063/1.3275577
2009-12-21
2014-04-21
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Integrated acoustic and magnetic separation in microfluidic channels
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/95/25/10.1063/1.3275577
10.1063/1.3275577
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM