No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Geminate electron-hole recombination in organic solids in the presence of a donor-acceptor heterojunction
1.C. Brabec, V. Dyakonov, and U. Scherf, Organic Photovoltaics: Materials, Device Physics, and Manufacturing Technologies (Wiley, Weinheim, 2008).
3.S. Westenhoff, I. A. Howard, J. M. Hodgkiss, K. R. Kirov, H. A. Bronstein, C. K. Williams, N. C. Greenham, and R. H. Friend, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 13653 (2008).
4.D. Veldman, Ö. Ipek, S. C. J. Meskers, J. Sweelssen, M. M. Koetse, S. C. Veenstra, J. M. Kroon, S. S. Van Bavel, J. Loos, and R. A. J. Janssen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 7721 (2008).
5.M. Schubert, C. Yin, M. Castellani, S. Bange, T. L. Tam, A. Sellinger, H. -H. Hörhold, T. Kietzke, and D. Neher, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 094703 (2009).
10.M. Tachiya, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 21, 167 (1983).
11.M. Wojcik and M. Tachiya, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 74, 132 (2005).
16.Comparison between the Onsager theory and Monte Carlo simulation results in Fig. 1(b) of Ref. 12 may not be fully appropriate because the physical models used in those two approaches are different. The Onsager theory assumes that the recombination occurs at zero reaction radius, while the model used in Monte Carlo simulations effectively assumes that the recombination occurs at nonzero reaction radius with the finite intrinsic recombination rate constant. This may be a reason for the discrepancies.
17.C. Groves, 26 Feb 2010 (private communication).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month