1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
High-power surface emission from terahertz distributed feedback lasers with a dual-slit unit cell
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3430522
/content/aip/journal/apl/96/19/10.1063/1.3430522
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/96/19/10.1063/1.3430522
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Left: computed Bragg spectra of dual-slit gratings with a period and different slit spacing. An optical mode created by distributed feedback from the peak at is coupled out vertically by the peak at . Their relative strength is determined by the slit spacing. Right: top views of the corresponding devices.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) Computed eigenfrequencies of a dual-slit grating as a function of slit spacing. Solid lines and points show the two band-edge modes of an infinite and finite length grating, respectively. The period is varied with the slit spacing (dashed line), in order to keep the frequency of the lower band-edge constant. (b) Computed far-field in the plane formed by device-axis and surface normal for the symmetric and antisymmetric modes of a single-slit (black) DFB and for the symmetric mode of a dual-slit (gray, red online) device with (normalized to the resonator energy).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) Surface loss rates of the symmetric mode at constant eigenfrequency, computed with different models. Blue squares are obtained by integration of the far-field (b) resulting from the near-field extracted from a 2D finite-length, finite-width model (c). The shown eigenmode is computed for a device with . The far-field is computed on a spherical wedge extending ±30° from the surface normal. While the various models show similar values up to a ratio of 0.6, the blue squares have a very different trend for larger slit separation, which is in better agreement with the experiment.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Light-current characteristics of devices with different slit spacing, measured for 400 ns long pulses at a 25 kHz repetition rate (1% duty cycle). Narrow and broad devices are plotted in the left and right panel, respectively, on different scales. In both cases, the slope efficiency seems to peak around . The maximum power of the first order DFB is about four orders of magnitude below the other devices . In the case of the largest slit spacing (0.7), the asymmetric mode reaches threshold first (power collected below 2.3 A), so the slope efficiency is not to be compared. The inset shows the spectrum of the device with slit spacing of 0.60 at 2.45 A on a logarithmic scale.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/apl/96/19/10.1063/1.3430522
2010-05-14
2014-04-20
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: High-power surface emission from terahertz distributed feedback lasers with a dual-slit unit cell
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/96/19/10.1063/1.3430522
10.1063/1.3430522
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM