1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Small gap semiconducting organic charge-transfer interfaces
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3449558
/content/aip/journal/apl/96/23/10.1063/1.3449558
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/96/23/10.1063/1.3449558
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(a) Structure of the molecules used in this work: TTF and TMTSF act as a donor and TCNQ as an acceptor. (b) Schematic representation of a device used to study transport at charge-transfer interfaces. The broken line represents the interfacial region where mobile charge carriers are present. (c) Optical microscope image of a device based on a TMTSF–TCNQ interface, including the scheme of the measurement configuration.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Panel (a) and (b) show the curves of TMTSF–TCNQ and TTF–TCNQ interfaces measured at room temperature in a two-terminal and a four-terminal configuration. (c) Histogram of the resistivity values of TMTSF–TCNQ and TTF–TCNQ interfaces measured in a four-terminal configuration, on more than 20 interfaces for each system. In both cases, the spread in values is approximately one order of magnitude.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The four-terminal curves of (a) TMTSF–TCNQ and (b) TTF–TCNQ interfaces measured at different temperatures ranging from 300 K to 200 K in 20 K steps. (c) The Arrhenius plot of the resistivity for both systems. The resistivity of TMTSF–TCNQ is thermally activated with activation energy (ranging between 70 and 120 meV; for the device shown here).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Schematic of the simplified band diagrams of (a) TMTSF–TCNQ and (b) TTF–TCNQ interfaces. For a TMTSF–TCNQ interface, the Fermi level lies in the gap between the HOMO of TMTSF and the LUMO of TCNQ, and charge transfer from TMTSF to TCNQ is thermally activated. In a similar diagram for a TTF–TCNQ interface, the HOMO of TTF is higher in energy than the LUMO of TCNQ, and charge transfer occurs spontaneously. In all materials, the Fermi level away from the interface lies in the middle of the HOMO-LUMO gap, as it should be, since the molecular crystals are intrinsic semiconductors.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/apl/96/23/10.1063/1.3449558
2010-06-08
2014-04-20
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Small gap semiconducting organic charge-transfer interfaces
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/96/23/10.1063/1.3449558
10.1063/1.3449558
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM