1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate)-based organic, ultrathin, and transparent sound-emitting device
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3666224
/content/aip/journal/apl/99/23/10.1063/1.3666224
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/99/23/10.1063/1.3666224
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(Color online) (a) Schematic diagram of the structure of a PEDOT:PSS-SED. (b) Photograph of a PEDOT:PSS-SED (PEDOT:PSS on glass). The area is 1.5 × 1.5 cm2. (c) Schematic diagram of spin coating in the deposition of a PEDOT:PSS film on arbitrary substrates. (d) A cross-sectional scanning electron micrograph of PEDOT:PSS film deposited on glass. The inset is the top view of PEDOT:PSS film.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(Color online) Acoustic test platform and results for the PEDOT:PSS-SED. (a) Schematic diagram of the test platform for measuring the sound emission from the PEDOT:PSS-SED. (b) Plot of the output SP versus the input power recorded at different sound frequencies. The measurement distance is 5 cm. (c) Plot of the output SPL of the PEDOT:PSS-SED versus the measurement distance. The input power is 0.2 W. (d) Plot of the output SPL versus the acoustic frequency recorded at different distances. The curves are normalized with the input power of 1 W.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(Color online) Theoretical model and results for the PEDOT:PSS-SED. (a) Schematic diagram of the proposed model for analyzing the PEDOT:PSS-SED. (b) Signal waveforms of (i) the input signal current, (ii) the temperature oscillation, and (iii) the sound wave signal. (c) SP versus the PEDOT:PSS thickness at different input powers. (d) SPL versus the PEDOT:PSS thickness at different distances. (e) The theoretical results of the SPL versus frequency for PEDOT:PSS on glass. The experimental results are included for comparison. (f) The theoretical results of efficiency versus frequency for PEDOT:PSS on glass. The experimental results are included for comparison.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(Color online) (a) Comparison of sound harmonic waves between the PEDOT:PSS-SED and a conventional piezo transducer. The fundamental frequency is 8 kHz and the measurement distance is 5 cm. (b) Plot of SPL versus the acoustic frequency for the PEDOT:PSS-SED and a conventional piezo transducer. The two cures are normalized with input power of 1 W. The SPL is recorded at a distance of 5 cm. (c) Transmittance spectra of PEDOT:PSS film for different numbers of layers. The inset is a photograph of one-layer, two-layer, and three-layer PEDOT:PSS on glass. (d) Plot of the frequency response spectrum of the PEDOT:PSS-SED integrated with an LCD screen. The SPL is recorded at input power of 1 W and a measurement distance of 5 cm. The inset shows the PEDOT:PSS-SED placement on the frame of a 14-in. LCD screen.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/apl/99/23/10.1063/1.3666224
2011-12-07
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate)-based organic, ultrathin, and transparent sound-emitting device
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/apl/99/23/10.1063/1.3666224
10.1063/1.3666224
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM