Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aip/journal/aplmater/4/3/10.1063/1.4943011
1.
1.S. Maekawa, S. O. Valenzuela, E. Saitoh, and T. Kimura, Spin Current (Oxford University Press, New York, 2012).
2.
2.P. Sharma, Science 307, 531 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1099388
3.
3.N. Nagaosa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 031010 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.77.031010
4.
4.G. E. W. Bauer, E. Saitoh, and B. J. van Wees, Nat. Mater. 11, 391 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat3301
5.
5.Y. Kajiwara, K. Harii, S. Takahashi, J. Ohe, K. Uchida, M. Mizuguchi, H. Umezawa, H. Kawai, K. Ando, K. Takanashi, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Nature 464, 262 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08876
6.
6.K. Uchida, S. Takahashi, K. Harii, J. Ieda, W. Koshibae, K. Ando, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Nature 455, 778 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07321
7.
7.C. M. Jaworski, J. Yang, S. Mack, D. D. Awschalom, J. P. Heremans, and R. C. Myers, Nat. Mater. 9, 898 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat2860
8.
8.K. Uchida, J. Xiao, H. Adachi, J. Ohe, S. Takahashi, J. Ieda, T. Ota, Y. Kajiwara, H. Umezawa, H. Kawai, G. E. W. Bauer, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Nat. Mater. 9, 894 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat2856
9.
9.K. Uchida, H. Adachi, T. Ota, H. Nakayama, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 172505 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3507386
10.
10.T. Kikkawa, K. Uchida, Y. Shiomi, Z. Qiu, D. Hou, D. Tian, H. Nakayama, X.-F. Jin, and E. Saitoh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 067207 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.067207
11.
11.K. Uchida, T. Ota, H. Adachi, J. Xiao, T. Nonaka, Y. Kajiwara, G. E. W. Bauer, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, J. Appl. Phys. 111, 103903 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4716012
12.
12.P. Li, D. Ellsworth, H. Chang, P. Janantha, D. Richardson, F. Shah, P. Phillips, T. Vijayasarathy, and M. Wu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 242412 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4904479
13.
13.S. M. Wu, J. E. Pearson, and A. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 186602 (2015).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.186602
14.
14.S. Seki, T. Ideue, M. Kubota, Y. Kozuka, R. Takagi, M. Nakamura, Y. Kaneko, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 266601 (2015).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.266601
15.
15.S. M. Wu, W. Zhang, A. KC, P. Borisov, J. E. Pearson, J. S. Jiang, D. Lederman, A. Hoffmann, and A. Bhattacharya, e-print arXiv:1509.00439 (2015).
16.
16.N. Momozawa, Y. Yamaguchi, H. Takei, and M. Mita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 54, 771 (1985).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.54.771
17.
17.N. Momozawa, Y. Yamaguchi, H. Takei, and M. Mita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 54, 3895 (1985).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.54.3895
18.
18.N. Momozawa and Y. Yamaguchi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 62, 1292 (1993).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.62.1292
19.
19.T. Kimura, G. Lawes, and A. P. Ramirez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 137201 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.137201
20.
20.T. Kimura, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 3, 93 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125101
21.
21.Y. Tokura, S. Seki, and N. Nagaosa, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 076501 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/7/076501
22.
22.Y. S. Chai, S. H. Chun, S. Y. Haam, Y. S. Oh, I. Kim, and K. H. Kim, New J. Phys. 11, 073030 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/073030
23.
23.S. Ishiwata, Y. Taguchi, H. Murakawa, Y. Onose, and Y. Tokura, Science 319, 1643 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1154507
24.
24.S. Ishiwata, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokunaga, H. Murakawa, Y. Onose, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. B 79, 180408(R) (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.180408
25.
25.G. Wang, S. Cao, Y. Cao, S. Hu, X. Wang, Z. Feng, B. Kang, Y. Chai, J. Zhang, and W. Ren, J. Appl. Phys. 118, 094102 (2015).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4929956
26.
26.H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and A. V. Balatsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 057205 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.057205
27.
27.Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, T. Goto, M. Matsuura, K. Hirota, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 147204 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.147204
28.
28.S. Y. Huang, X. Fan, D. Qu, Y. P. Chen, W. G. Wang, J. Wu, T. Y. Chen, J. Q. Xiao, and C. L. Chien, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 107204 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.107204
29.
29.K. Taniguchi, N. Abe, S. Ohtani, and T. Arima, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 147201 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.147201
30.
30.T. Nakajima, S. Mitsuda, H. Yamazaki, and M. Matsuura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, 024706 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.82.024706
31.
31.Y. Hiraoka, Y. Tanaka, T. Kojima, Y. Takata, M. Oura, Y. Senba, H. Ohashi, Y. Wakabayashi, S. Shin, and T. Kimura, Phys. Rev. B 84, 064418 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.064418
32.
32.Y. Hiraoka, Y. Tanaka, M. Oura, Y. Wakabayashi, and T. Kimura, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 384, 160 (2015).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.02.028
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/aplmater/4/3/10.1063/1.4943011
Loading
/content/aip/journal/aplmater/4/3/10.1063/1.4943011
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/aplmater/4/3/10.1063/1.4943011
2016-03-01
2016-10-01

Abstract

We report the experimental observation of longitudinal spin Seebeck effect in a multiferroic helimagnet BaSrZnFeO. Temperature gradient applied normal to BaSrZnFeO/Pt interface generates inverse spin Hall voltage of spin current origin in Pt, whose magnitude was found to be proportional to bulk magnetization of BaSrZnFeO even through the successive magnetic transitions among various helimagnetic and ferrimagnetic phases. This finding demonstrates that the helimagnetic spin wave can be an effective carrier of spin current. By controlling the population ratio of spin-helicity domains characterized by clockwise/counter-clockwise manner of spin rotation with use of poling electric field in the ferroelectric helimagnetic phase, we found that spin-helicity domain distribution does not affect the magnitude of spin current injected into Pt. The results suggest that the spin-wave spin current is rather robust against the spin-helicity domain wall, unlike the case with the conventional ferromagneticdomain wall.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/aplmater/4/3/1.4943011.html;jsessionid=hkDM-6fTP-FhOalGDnUJDELr.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/aip/journal/aplmater/4/3/10.1063/1.4943011&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/aplmater
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=APLMaterials.aip.org/4/3/10.1063/1.4943011&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/aplmater/4/3/10.1063/1.4943011'
Top,Right1,Right2,Right3,