1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Rapid separation of bacteriorhodopsin using a laminar-flow extraction system in a microfluidic device
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3298608
/content/aip/journal/bmf/4/1/10.1063/1.3298608
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/bmf/4/1/10.1063/1.3298608

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic of a complex microfluidic purification system by combining two different types of the separation process (two-phase extraction process and three-flow desalting system). (a) Two-phase extraction process (ATPS and ILTPS) was performed to purify BR from the cell lysate sample. PEG-rich (or ionic liquid phase) and water-rich phases were injected through both sides inlet ports by pressure-driven flow. Subsequently, sample solution was introduced into the middle inlet channel. Under the formation of the laminar-flow extraction system, impurities diffuse away from the cell lysate stream depending on the difference in hydrophobicity and biomolecular interactions. (b) Three-flow desalting dialysis was applied for the removal of contaminated proteins and excessive sucrose after fractionation of the sample stream from the laminar-flow extraction process.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Photograph of microfluidic device and the formation of the stable three-phase stream in the microchannel. (a) Center region near the inlets of the microchannel, (b) middle area of the microchannel, and (c) center region near the outlets of the microchannel. The flow rates of the PEG-rich and the salt-rich phases were 0.2 and 3.0 ml/h, respectively, and that of the sample phase kept at 0.7 ml/h.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Effect of pH on (a) the recovery rate and (b) the purity of BR using two kinds of purification techniques (ATPS and ILTPS) in the microfluidic device.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Effect of flow rate of both buffer phases on the recovery rate and purity of BR in the microdialysis system.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Effect of pH on the recovery rate of BR and the removal efficiency of sucrose using the three-flow dialysis system in the microfluidic device.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Characterization of purified BR proteins by (a) SDS-PAGE. SM, molecular size marker; lane 1, BR; lane 2, BR; lane 3, BR; lane 4, BR; black arrow, target BR. (b) MALDI-TOF analysis recorded with the DHB matrix from the BR sample purified through the microfluidic device. The purified target BR was analyzed as a protein sample having a molecular weight of 27 088.9 Da.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Recovery and purity of BR, and the removal of sucrose with different pHs in the microdialysis system.

Generic image for table
Table II.

Purification profile related to each step.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/bmf/4/1/10.1063/1.3298608
2010-01-27
2014-04-25
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Rapid separation of bacteriorhodopsin using a laminar-flow extraction system in a microfluidic device
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/bmf/4/1/10.1063/1.3298608
10.1063/1.3298608
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM