banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Optofluidics incorporating actively controlled micro- and nano-particles
Rent this article for


Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Hydrodynamic particle manipulation. (a) Drag force acting on a particle under microfluidic flow; (b) sheath flow focusing; (c) sheathless flow focusing; (d) H-shaped inlet and outlet microfluidic separation system.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Acoustophoretic manipulation of suspended particles. (a) Acoustophoretic manipulation of particles when subject to acoustic waves. (b) Schematic of acoustophoretic sorting of a mixture of particles with different density and compressibility properties.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Schematic of a particle experiencing the electrophoretic force.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Schematic of DEP manipulation of particles. (a) When Re[fCM(ω)] > 0, the particle experiences a positive DEP pulling it towards the region of high electric field gradients; (b) when Re[fCM(ω)] < 0, the particle experiences a negative DEP repelling it from the region of high electric field gradients.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Schematic of thermophoretic manipulation of particles. Thermophilic particles drift toward hotter regions, while thermophobic particles drift toward the cooler regions.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Optical manipulation of suspended particles using (a) direct optical tweezing; (b) near field optical manipulation of suspended particles; (c) manipulation of particles using plasmonic nanostructures.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Magnetophoretic manipulation of suspended particles. (a) Particle is pulled toward the region of high magnetic field gradients when χp > χm. (b) Particle is repelled from the region of high magnetic field gradients when χp < χm.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Hydrodynamically focused nanoparticles used as optical waveguiding media. (a) Schematic of nanoparticle optofluidic waveguide using polysterene nanobeads and DI water, as the core and cladding, respectively. (b) Intensity distribution at the waveguide output showing a high core to cladding intensity ratio. Reproduced with permission from R. S. Conroy, B. T. Mayers, D. V. Vezenov, D. B. Wolfe, M. G. Prentiss, and G. M. Whitesides, Appl. Opt. 44, 36 (2005). Copyright © 2005 American Chemical Society.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Waveguide tuning using DEP focused particles. (a) WO3 nanoparticles focused in the center of the DEP electrodes using positive DEP forces. (b) Light was coupled into the particle dense media above rib waveguide. (c) WO3 nanoparticles repelled from the center. (d) Light remains in the polymeric rib waveguide. Reproduced with permission from A. A. Kayani, A. F. Chrimes, K. Khoshmanesh, V. Sivan, E. Zeller, K. Kalantar-zadeh, and A. Mitchell, Microfluid. Nanofluid. 11, 1 (2011). Copyright © 2011 Springer Verlag.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Optofluidic lens using suspended particles controlled by optical forces. (a) Schematic of the experimental geometry for beam manipulation. FDTD field output depending on the microsphere position: (b) on axis, (c) off axis, (d) leaving beam. (e) Insertion loss experimental and numerical simulation data with transmission regimes are identified. Reproduced with permission from P. Domachuk, M. Cronin-Golomb, B. J. Eggleton, S. Mutzenich, G. Rosengarten, and A. Mitchell, Opt. Express 13, 19 (2005). Copyright © 2005 American Chemical Society.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Particle transport using an optofluidic ring resonator. (a) Schematic of optofluidic ring resonator switch with boxed figure showing the switching mechanism due to optical forces when the ring is strongly coupled at the resonant wavelength. (b) Trapped particles are diverted and continue to move forward on the ring under the on-resonance state. (c) In the off-resonant state, particles pass through the switching junction and are not routed into the ring structure. Reproduced with permission from A. H. J. Yang and D. Erickson, Lab Chip 10, 6 (2010). Copyright © 2010 The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Optofluidic ARROW platform optimized for particle detection. (a) Schematic of the integrated optofluidic system with perpendicular excitation/collection geometry for detecting bio-molecules (b) SEM images of solid core and (c) liquid core ARROW waveguide cross-sections. Reproduced with permission from P. Measor, B. S. Phillips, A. Chen, A. R. Hawkins, and H. Schmidt, Lab Chip 11, 5 (2011). Copyright © 2011 The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

Raman spectroscopy analysis using a DEP microfluidic platform. (a) Schematic of DEP-Raman system layout. (b) Plot of WO3 nanoparticle Raman spectra at different DEP frequencies, decreasing in frequency along the z-axis. Reproduced with permission from A. F. Chrimes, A. A. Kayani, K. Khoshmanesh, P. R. Stoddart, P. Mulvaney, A. Mitchell, and K. Kalantar-zadeh, Lab Chip 11, 5 (2011). Copyright © 2011 The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

Optofluidic device used for plasmonic transport of particles. (a) Schematic of optofluidic-plasmonic trapping device, consisting of a gold stripe in a microfluidic channel formed on a microscope glass slide. (b) Time sequence of scattered light images of particles in the microfluidic channel. Adapted from Ref. 183.

Image of FIG. 15.
FIG. 15.

Thermophoretic transport of aptamer bindings: (a) The blood serum inside the capillary is locally heated with a focused IR laser, which is coupled into an epifluorescence microscope using a heat-reflecting “hot” mirror. (b) The fluorescence inside the capillary is imaged with a CCD camera, and the normalized fluorescence in the heated spot is plotted against time. The IR laser is switched on at t = 5 s, the fluorescence decreases as the temperature increases, and the labeled aptamers move away from the heated spot because of thermophoresis. When the IR laser is switched off, the molecules diffuse back. Reproduced with permission from P. Baaske, C. J. Wienken, P. Reineck, S. Duhr, and D. Braun, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 49, 12 (2010). Copyright © 2010 John Wiley and Sons.

Image of FIG. 16.
FIG. 16.

Captured images of the discrimination of normal and abnormal oocytes using an optically induced DEP electrode scanning from left to right. Samples were manipulated at the DEP voltage of 10 Vp at 1 MHz. When the DEP signal was applied and the projected DEP electrodes were moved, only the normal oocyte were displaced in the direction of image pattern, while the abnormal oocytes remained at the initial position. Reprinted with permission from H. Hwang, D.-H. Lee, W. Choi, and J.-K. Park, Biomicrofluidics 3, 1 (2009). Copyright © 2009 American Institute of Physics.


Generic image for table
Table I.

Summary of particle manipulation methods, features, limitations, and references.


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Optofluidics incorporating actively controlled micro- and nano-particles