1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Microfluidic trapping of giant unilamellar vesicles to study transport through a membrane pore
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4816712
/content/aip/journal/bmf/7/4/10.1063/1.4816712
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/bmf/7/4/10.1063/1.4816712
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Microfluidic device design. (a) Schematic showing a trapped GUV isolated by a donut valve. (b) Enlargement showing the fluid flow being diverted around the trap in the presence of a GUV, before the donut is lowered. (c) Bright-field image showing 30 of the 60 micro-chambers with a height of 20 m. Fluidic isolation by the donuts is demonstrated using blue and red food dye at various dilutions. Scale bar: 500 m. (d) Schematic cross-section illustrating the washing step and the function of the valves.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Trapping of GUVs. (a) Wide-field fluorescence image of a single GUV trapped hydrodynamically by the posts (black). The surrounding calcein solution (green) is diverted around the trap. Fluid flow lines are indicated by the dashed lines. (b) The fluid was then exchanged for water without removing the calcein filled GUV. (c) Bright-field image of the donut (grey scale) overlaid with a fluorescence image of the GUV. The membrane is stained with DiI (red). Scale bars: 20 m. (d) 3-D rendering (using confocal micrographs and ImageJ) of the calcein fluorescence showing minimum deformation of the trapped vesicle.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Histograms of GUV sizes. (a) Before being introduced into the device, the GUVs have a wide size distribution with an average diameter of 25.1 ± 23.6 m (blue) ( = 483). After flushing through the device, the trapped GUVs have a more narrow size distribution with an average diameter of 14.0 ± 4.7 m (green) ( = 64) for 20 m high channels and 5.8 ± 1.4 m (black) (n = 53) for 10 m high channels. Representative vesicles of 8, 17 and 6 m diameter are shown in (b), (c), and (d) respectively. Scale bar: 5 m.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

αHL pore formation. (a) Confocal fluorescence images of calcein being released from a GUV with 50 g/ml αHL. Scale bar: 10 m. (b) Kinetics of calcein release for 0, 0.5, 2.5, and 50 g/ml αHL using 4 separate vesicles. The control without αHL showed no calcein release. The number of individual experiments at a given αHL concentration was, n = 3. Error bars are calculated from the standard deviation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/bmf/7/4/10.1063/1.4816712
2013-07-26
2014-04-21
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Microfluidic trapping of giant unilamellar vesicles to study transport through a membrane pore
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/bmf/7/4/10.1063/1.4816712
10.1063/1.4816712
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM