1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Variability of contact process in complex networks
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3664403
/content/aip/journal/chaos/21/4/10.1063/1.3664403
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/chaos/21/4/10.1063/1.3664403
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Evolution of both i(t) and for the different disease models where the “triangles” and “circles” denote the cases of SF and RG networks with the random initial seeds. i(t) versus t for SI model (a), SIS model (b), and SIR model (c), and versus t for SI model (d), SIS model (e), and SIR model (f). The parameters are chosen as N = 0.5 × 104, , λ = 1, and μ = 0.2. The results are averaged over 2 × 104 independent realizations in one network.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Evolution of both i(t) and in community networks where the “squares,” “circles,” “triangleups,” “triangledowns,” and “trianglelefts” denote the cases of the bridgeness, d = 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. i(t) versus t for SI model (a), SIS model (b), and SIR model (c), and versus t for SI model (d), SIS model (e), and SIR model (f). The parameters are chosen as N = 104, , λ = 1, and μ = 0.2. The results are averaged over 2 × 104 independent realizations.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The distribution of arrival time of disease in the second community for SI model (a), SIS model (b), and SIR model (c), where the “squares,” “circles,” “triangleups,” “triangledowns,” and “trianglelefts” denote the cases of the bridgeness, d = 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The results are averaged over 2 × 104 independent realizations.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Evolution of both i(t) and in the second community where the “squares,” “circles,” “triangleups,” “triangledowns,” and “trianglelefts” denote the cases of the bridgeness, d = 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. i(t) versus t for SI model (a), SIS model (b), and SIR model (c), and versus t for SI model (d), SIS model (e), and SIR model (f). The results are averaged over 2 × 104 independent realizations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/chaos/21/4/10.1063/1.3664403
2011-12-07
2014-04-20
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Variability of contact process in complex networks
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/chaos/21/4/10.1063/1.3664403
10.1063/1.3664403
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM