• journal/journal.article
• aip/chaos
• /content/aip/journal/chaos/22/2/10.1063/1.4729137
• chaos.aip.org
1887
No data available.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Landscapes of non-gradient dynamics without detailed balance: Stable limit cycles and multiple attractors
USD
10.1063/1.4729137
Hao Ge1,a) and Hong Qian2,b)
View Affiliations Hide Affiliations
Affiliations:
1 Beijing International Center for Mathematical Research (BICMR) and Biodynamic Optical Imaging Center (BIOPIC), Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China
2 Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
a) Email: haoge@pku.edu.cn.
Chaos 22, 023140 (2012)
/content/aip/journal/chaos/22/2/10.1063/1.4729137
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/chaos/22/2/10.1063/1.4729137
View: Figures

## Figures

FIG. 1.

Landscape and related Kramers’ rate theory for a bistable system. The local minima correspond to stable fixed points of a deterministic dynamics while the maximum corresponds to an unstable fixed (saddle) point. The V(1,2) and V(2,1) represent the energy barriers for exiting energy wells 1 and 2, respectively. For very small , the stationary probability distribution for stochastic dynamics with Brownian motion B(t), , is . The Kramers theory yields transition rates between the two attractors: and . According to Freidlin-Wentzell’s LDT, this theory still applies for every pair of neighbouring attractors of a non-gradient system in terms of a local landscape. However, the stationary probability distribution follows a different, global landscape. Also see Fig. .

FIG. 2.

(a) The thin solid line is , where f is represented by theslope of the dashed line. The thick solid line is . When combining with , as shown in (b), one obtains given in (c). is periodic but contains non-differentiable points. If is monotonically decreasing, then and .

FIG. 3.

The limiting distribution according to Eq. for nonlinear dynamics on a circle , with f = 5, 2, 1.1, and 1.05. With , it approaches to . For , the distribution is where .

FIG. 4.

(a) Pairwise local landscapes; (b) a simple “pasting together” leads to discontinuous matched case; (c) the global landscape is obtained by a “ -surgery and pasting” procedure: The surgery lifts the well-2 with respect to well-1 an amount of , which is precisely the free energy difference for well-2 with respect to well-1 in nonequilibrium steady state. Similarly, it lifts the amount of for well-3 with respect to well-2, and for well-1 with respect to well-3. Therefore, the total lift is ; (d)the final global landscape. Note that –V(x) in Fig. is just one example of such a global landscape. It is a piecewise smooth function with “flat regions” at its local maxima.

/content/aip/journal/chaos/22/2/10.1063/1.4729137
2012-06-15
2014-04-20

Article
content/aip/journal/chaos
Journal
5
3

### Most cited this month

More Less
This is a required field