banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Landscapes of non-gradient dynamics without detailed balance: Stable limit cycles and multiple attractors
Rent this article for
View: Figures


Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Landscape and related Kramers’ rate theory for a bistable system. The local minima correspond to stable fixed points of a deterministic dynamics while the maximum corresponds to an unstable fixed (saddle) point. The V(1,2) and V(2,1) represent the energy barriers for exiting energy wells 1 and 2, respectively. For very small , the stationary probability distribution for stochastic dynamics with Brownian motion B(t), , is . The Kramers theory yields transition rates between the two attractors: and . According to Freidlin-Wentzell’s LDT, this theory still applies for every pair of neighbouring attractors of a non-gradient system in terms of a local landscape. However, the stationary probability distribution follows a different, global landscape. Also see Fig. 4 .

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) The thin solid line is , where f is represented by theslope of the dashed line. The thick solid line is . When combining with , as shown in (b), one obtains given in (c). is periodic but contains non-differentiable points. If is monotonically decreasing, then and .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The limiting distribution according to Eq. (23) for nonlinear dynamics on a circle , with f = 5, 2, 1.1, and 1.05. With , it approaches to . For , the distribution is where .

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) Pairwise local landscapes; (b) a simple “pasting together” leads to discontinuous matched case; (c) the global landscape is obtained by a “ -surgery and pasting” procedure: The surgery lifts the well-2 with respect to well-1 an amount of , which is precisely the free energy difference for well-2 with respect to well-1 in nonequilibrium steady state. 43 Similarly, it lifts the amount of for well-3 with respect to well-2, and for well-1 with respect to well-3. Therefore, the total lift is ; (d)the final global landscape. Note that –V(x) in Fig. 2(c) is just one example of such a global landscape. It is a piecewise smooth function with “flat regions” at its local maxima.


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Landscapes of non-gradient dynamics without detailed balance: Stable limit cycles and multiple attractors