1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Emitting waves from heterogeneity by a rotating electric field
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4822417
/content/aip/journal/chaos/23/3/10.1063/1.4822417
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/chaos/23/3/10.1063/1.4822417
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Evolution of turbulence in the presence of an obstacle under the control of a PEF with and . (a) PEF ( ) successfully excites waves on big obstacle ( ). (b) Wave cannot be generated from the obstacle ( ) by weak PEF ( ). (c) PEF ( ) applied on medium with small obstacle ( ) cannot induce waves. In the three evolutions, the initial states are identical. The center hollow in every system represents the obstacle.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

The process of successful control by a REF with  = 0.8 and  = 3.3. The radius of obstacle is 3.1.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Development of turbulence with PEF (a) and with REF (b). Parameters:  = 0.4,  =  = 3.3, R = 8.0.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

vs. curve when a PEF (squares) and a REF (circles) are applied separately. and are minimal radius of the obstacle and minimal intensity of the electric field to successfully excite waves, respectively. Inset (a) is the ratio of (REF/PEF). Inset (b) shows the dependence of minimum period of applied REF on radius of obstacle. The dot line fits the simulation data.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

A process shows how a spiral wave is generated from a circular obstacle by a REF. The (yellow) arrows show the direction of the clockwise rotating electric field. The (red) arrows shows the prolonged tips resulted from REF while the (white) arrow denotes another propagating tip of the crescent wave.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

The application of REF and PEF results in different time to suppress turbulence. Four points around the obstacle has been shown in Fig. 1(a) (see the pattern at  = 10). The dashed lines show temporary periods of fixed points controlled by REF while the solid lines show that by PEF. (a) Grid on the downside of the obstacle (blue point in Fig. 1(a) ). (b) Grid on the upside of the obstacle (yellow point in Fig. 1(a) ). (c) Grid on the left side of the obstacle (green point in Fig. 1(a) ). (d) Grid on the right side of the obstacle (magenta point in Fig. 1(a) ). The frequency of background turbulence without control, which can be obtained by FFT, is 0.262 (corresponding period 3.82). The period of the electric field is 3.3.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Evolution of turbulence around an elliptic obstacle (The lengths of long-axis and short-axis are 8.0 and 2.0, respectively) under the control of PEF with  = 0.2 and  = 3.2.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Turbulence suppression around an elliptic obstacle by a REF with  = 0.2 and  = 3.2.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/chaos/23/3/10.1063/1.4822417
2013-09-24
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Emitting waves from heterogeneity by a rotating electric field
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/chaos/23/3/10.1063/1.4822417
10.1063/1.4822417
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM