banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Femtosecond electron pulse propagation for ultrafast electron diffraction
Rent this article for


Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic of a photocathode used for ultrafast electron diffraction (UED). The present work focuses on the free-space propagation of the bunch from the grid to the sample. A separate laser beam (not shown) drives changes in the sample.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Universal self-expansion curves for a Gaussian pulse in the 1D limit. Only half of the symmetric pulse is shown, in the reference frame of the pulse. The initial density is given by , while the time scale is set by . All axes are nondimensionalized as indicated. Times are , , , , , , and . (a) Charge density vs longitudinal position. (b) Velocity vs longitudinal position. The asymptotic linear chirp line is included for . The flattopped central part of the pulse approaches this line.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Conceptual sketch for the mean-field approach. (a) A rotationally symmetric electron bunch in its center-of-mass frame, with half maximum widths and . (b) Coulomb’s law yields an electric field, the component of which governs the longitudinal expansion. (c) The electric field will be roughly linear out to a “typical” distance which we take as . Under the linear approximation the pulse will expand self-similarly in the direction. Deviations from linearity will change the shape of the pulse as time passes. A similar construction can model the transverse expansion.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Various forms of the longitudinal shape factor .

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Expansion rates and longitudinal pulse profiles calculated by a variety of models. The following parameters, typical of current UED systems, were used: electrons, , initial pulse FWHM, initial , initial (top-hat transverse, Gaussian longitudinal), propagation time , zero initial temperature, and zero initial transverse expansion. The plasma frequency for the peak initial electron density comes to , so the simulation runs for a time equal to . Models are as specified in Table II, plus the original mean-field model . “Central” refers to the longitudinal profile for those electrons within of the axis; otherwise all electrons are included (“full” profiles). The notation only refers to restricted -electron simulations which only include longitudinal acceleration (all other models except the 2DCP radial coupled are similarly restricted). -electron results are accumulated from 25 runs.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Longitudinal phase space plots calculated by a variety of models, at the end of the simulation time. See Fig. 5 and Table II for parameters and abbreviations. (b)–(e) add a linear offset to accentuate the differences among models. (b) and (c) contrast continuum and multiparticle approaches to the same problem. (e) is a close-up of the turnaround region in (d).

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Projections of the final phase space density for electron bunches with the following initial conditions: electrons, , , initial FWHM pulse , initial FWHM , and Gaussian initial longitudinal distribution. Projections are (first column) in the plane, (second column) on the axis, and (third column) on the plane (with a linear offset to accentuate the differences). Initial conditions are (a) top-hat initial transverse profile, (b) Gaussian initial transverse profile, (c) Gaussian transverse profile with an added temperature (equilibrated before acceleration), (d) top-hat transverse profile with no temperature but with a initial divergence angle, and (e) as (d), but with a Gaussian transverse profile.


Generic image for table
Table I.

Numerical calculations of the relationships between transverse and longitudinal time constants for a cylinder of constant charge density , length , and radius , expressed as a set of dimensionless numbers for each aspect ratio . The scaled electric fields at the surface are related to time constants according to the equation with for transverse motion and for longitudinal motion.

Generic image for table
Table II.

Summary of the modeling approaches considered in this work. The original mean-field (MF) model fits in the 2DCP category, using a scaling parameter to distinguish different profiles. The last six rows indicate the success of the model in reproducing a given physical effect, with a blank entry indicating that the model makes no attempt. “Partial” modeling of transverse expansion means it can either be neglected (in favorable cases), externally specified (useful in experimental situations where lenses are adjusted to compensate transverse space charge expansion), or calculated using a coupled transverse expansion model, as discussed in the text. In these partial cases, if the transverse expansion is significant and left uncorrected then the “good” entries should be replaced with “medium.” Semiquantitatively, good implies correct within a few percent and medium within a few tens of percent for typical UED parameters, while “poor” could easily be off be a factor of 2 or more.


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Femtosecond electron pulse propagation for ultrafast electron diffraction