1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Interdiffusion in Fe–Pt multilayers
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2355552
/content/aip/journal/jap/100/7/10.1063/1.2355552
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/100/7/10.1063/1.2355552

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Comparison of the corrected specular XRR curves: measurements (+) and simulations (thick lines).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

XRD patterns of ML1 (a) and ML2 (b) multilayers at different temperatures. For clarity, the spectra are shifted along the intensity scale. The peaks of the stainless-steel holder are marked with . The arrows mark the position of the FePt peak.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Dependence of the relative intensity of the satellite on temperature for ML1 (a) and ML2 (b) samples. The dotted lines are fits to the data.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Dependence of the average FWHM of the satellite on temperature for ML1 (a) and ML2 (b) samples. The dashed and dash-dotted lines are only guides for the eyes.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Dependence of the FWHM of the XRD peak along the direction on temperature for ML1 (a) and ML2 (b). The dashed and dash-dotted lines are only guides for the eyes.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Simulated (line) and experimental (+) XRD patterns for a ML1 sample at .

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Variation of the spacings with the atomic plane index at different temperatures for a ML1 sample.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Decay of the intensities of the XRD satellite as a function of annealing time and temperature for ML1 (a) and ML2 (b) samples.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Decay of the intensities of the XRR satellite as a function of annealing time and temperature for ML2 samples. The insert shows the XRR curves at for different delay times in the order from the top: 0, 195, 420, 660, 900, 1097, and .

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Dependence of the integral intensity of the FePt phase peak on annealing time at . Model (full line), model (dashed line).

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Dependence of on .

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Arrhenius plot of vs .

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Deposition parameters.

Generic image for table
Table II.

Structural parameters of the investigated multilayers at room temperature, obtained from simulations of specular XRR curves and XRD patterns. Estimated standard deviations are given in parentheses.

Generic image for table
Table III.

Interdiffusion coefficients at different temperatures.

Generic image for table
Table IV.

Measured values of , and predicted values for , , , and the gradient-energy coefficient .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/100/7/10.1063/1.2355552
2006-10-13
2014-04-17
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Interdiffusion in Fe–Pt multilayers
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/100/7/10.1063/1.2355552
10.1063/1.2355552
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM