1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Correlated photon emission in a thick barrier coupled quantum dot
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2802295
/content/aip/journal/jap/102/9/10.1063/1.2802295
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/102/9/10.1063/1.2802295
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

One-color PL and PLE spectra of two pairs of thick barrier CQDs (CQDs A and B), where the PL spectra were obtained under excitation (absorption band of wetting layer). QD1 and QD2 indicate the two QDs in a single CQD. LO indicates the excited state resonant with the longitudinal optical phonon . (b) PL spectra of the CQDs in Fig. 1(a) excited by one-color (middle and bottom) and two-color (top) excitations. and indicate the excitation energies of the two laser sources, as indicated in Fig. 1(a).

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(a) Excitation power dependence of integral PL intensities in CQD A. QD1 and QD2 were excited at and , respectively. With two-color excitation, the detection of QD1 was performed under various intensities with constant excitation, and vice versa. The solid lines are curves fitting the exponent to the excitation power. (b) Diagram of excitation condition and carrier occupation in a thick barrier CQD.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) Energy level diagram of QD1. (b) Increment ratio of QD1 PL intensity in CQD A under two-color excitation as a function of excitation intensity , where the intensity was constant (1.0 or ). The solid lines are fitting curves with our model.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) Experimental configuration for the time correlated single photon counting measurement pursuant to the Hanbury-Brown-Twiss setup. [(b) and (c)] Second-order autophoton correlation spectra of QD1 (b) and QD2 (c) with one-color excitation. The excitation energy was for QD1 and for QD2 as indicated in Fig. 1(a).

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Second-order autophoton correlation spectra of QD2 with one-color excitation. The excitation energy was higher (a) or lower (b) than the LO-phonon resonant level [ and are indicated in Fig. 1(a)]. indicates the decay time of the bunching feature.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Second-order photon correlation spectra with two-color excitation. [(a) and (b)] Autophoton correlation spectra of QD1 (a) and QD2 (b). (c) Cross photon correlation spectrum between QD1 and QD2. indicates the recovery time of the antibunching feature.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Photon detection process in the auto photon correlation measurement.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Carrier occupation diagram in a thick barrier CQD and the photon detection process in the cross photon correlation measurement . The carrier occupation diagram includes the intraband energy relaxation process in each QD.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/jap/102/9/10.1063/1.2802295
2007-11-02
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Correlated photon emission in a thick barrier coupled quantum dot
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/jap/102/9/10.1063/1.2802295
10.1063/1.2802295
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM